1995
DOI: 10.14214/sf.a9207
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Properties of top soil and the relationship between soil and trees in a boreal Scots pine stand.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We found spatial autocorrelation in the carbon stock of the organic layer, that has already been demonstrated in many other studies for a range of soil properties (Järvinen et al, 1993;Hokkanen et al, 1995;Liski, 1995;Bruckner et al, 1999;Möttönen et al, 1999;Muukkonen et al, 2009). Therefore, the spatial structure of the data was considered in the analysis of the soil data.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…We found spatial autocorrelation in the carbon stock of the organic layer, that has already been demonstrated in many other studies for a range of soil properties (Järvinen et al, 1993;Hokkanen et al, 1995;Liski, 1995;Bruckner et al, 1999;Möttönen et al, 1999;Muukkonen et al, 2009). Therefore, the spatial structure of the data was considered in the analysis of the soil data.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…This is consistent with two studies in Pinus sylvestris stands. In one, there was no clear spatial dependence over intervals of 5-50 m (Hokkanen et al 1995), and in the other, spatial dependence occurred mainly at distances less than 5 meters (Liski 1995). We conclude that spatial autocorrelation was not a concern with the 5 m sampling intervals used in this study.…”
Section: Spatial Autocorrelationmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…From our observations, however, forest floor variability is small over a scale of centimetres compared with a scale of meters. In support of this, organic layer accumulation is greater under canopies or close to tree stems (Hokkanen et al 1995, Liski 1995 which in most stands provides a patterning on the scale of meters. Consequently, we doubt that a larger cross-sectional area would have a significant impact on sampling variability.…”
Section: Data Inmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hokkanen et al (1995) tested the relationship between the tree influence potential and soil properties and found that areas with low influence potential of trees had a smaller amount of total carbon, though the result was not significant in the organic layer. Studies on tree influence have commonly been based on one study site (Hokkanen et al 1995;Liski 1995).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%