1996
DOI: 10.1016/0026-2714(95)00143-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Properties of the Akaike information criterion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Modifications of the AIC which may have some advantages over the AIC, see [3] and references therein for details, were tested leading nonetheless to similar conclusions.…”
Section: Parameter Valuementioning
confidence: 85%
“…Modifications of the AIC which may have some advantages over the AIC, see [3] and references therein for details, were tested leading nonetheless to similar conclusions.…”
Section: Parameter Valuementioning
confidence: 85%
“…The likelihood ratio chi-square was calculated with Cox regression to measure homogeneity; a higher likelihood ratio chi-square score indicates better homogeneity (31). We used the Akaike information criterion (AIC) within the Cox regression model to compare the performance of the 2 prognostic systems; smaller AIC values represent better optimistic prognostic stratification (32). We calculated the relative likelihood of two models using the following formula: exp {[AIC (model A) -AIC (model B)]/2}.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The goodness of the fits of the constant model and the linear model for eac compared with AIC (Akaike Information Criterion) method (Awad 1996)…”
Section: Determination Of Habitat-related Sr:ca Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%