2019
DOI: 10.1520/acem20190013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Properties of Nanosilica-Modified Concrete Cast and Cured under Cyclic Freezing/Low Temperatures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This can be substantiated by the fact that all composites tested herein had a DF surpassing 90% and exceeding the 60% relative dynamic modulus of elasticity limit stipulated by ASTM C666 [38], which qualifies them for outdoors exposures in cold regions [44]. Indeed, the presence of adequate air content of 6 ± 1% was essential to accommodate the hydraulic/osmotic pressures in concrete caused by freezing-thawing cycles [43,[45][46][47]. In addition, the absorption percentages of all composites were in the narrow range of 2 to 2.5% without significant difference, indicating very low penetrability [40,[46][47][48].…”
Section: Numerical Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This can be substantiated by the fact that all composites tested herein had a DF surpassing 90% and exceeding the 60% relative dynamic modulus of elasticity limit stipulated by ASTM C666 [38], which qualifies them for outdoors exposures in cold regions [44]. Indeed, the presence of adequate air content of 6 ± 1% was essential to accommodate the hydraulic/osmotic pressures in concrete caused by freezing-thawing cycles [43,[45][46][47]. In addition, the absorption percentages of all composites were in the narrow range of 2 to 2.5% without significant difference, indicating very low penetrability [40,[46][47][48].…”
Section: Numerical Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Indeed, the presence of adequate air content of 6 ± 1% was essential to accommodate the hydraulic/osmotic pressures in concrete caused by freezing-thawing cycles [43,[45][46][47]. In addition, the absorption percentages of all composites were in the narrow range of 2 to 2.5% without significant difference, indicating very low penetrability [40,[46][47][48]. This is attributed to the fact that all composites tested herein had high binder contents (≥700 kg/m 3 ) and low w/b (0.30), which would make them resistant to fluid ingress and in turn saturation, which is the necessary condition for frost damage of concrete.…”
Section: Numerical Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%