In CO 2 projects for enhanced oil recovery (EOR) a critical factor is possible early CO 2 breakthrough and consequently poor sweep efficiency. Injection of foam can block and divert CO 2 which may improve sweep efficiency.Large changes in physical properties of CO 2 with temperature and pressure might affect CO 2 -foam performance under various reservoir conditions. Recently, we have focused on understanding supercritical CO 2 -foam properties and this paper describes the importance of supercritical CO 2 density on CO 2 -foam performance in outcrop Berea sandstone core material.Foam flooding experiments were conducted in sandstone core material at different pressures from 30 to 280 bar and at temperatures of 50 and 90°C using an AOS C14/16 surfactant. Results showed high foam strengths at low CO 2 density. In fact, the strongest supercritical CO 2 -foam was generated at the lowest supercritical CO 2 density tested, quite comparable to foam strength obtained with gaseous CO 2 . Only reduced foam strengths were found with dense supercritical CO 2 (MRF 3-11).Foam generation was studied with both equilibrated and non-equilibrated fluids. Previously, we showed that CO 2 -foam stability and blocking ability were strongly reduced when mass transfer occured. In this study delay in foam strength build-up was observed with non-equilibrated fluids. In addition, visual observations of the foam texture indicated larger bubbles.Compared to N 2 -foams at similar conditions CO 2 -foams were weaker and showed coarser foam structure.Recently in Aarra et al., (2012), we focused on understanding CO 2 -foam properties below and above the critical point of CO 2 (P c ≈ 73.8 bar, T c ≈ 31.0°C). Strong CO 2 -foams were generated when CO 2 was in its gaseous state (30 bar, 50°C). Weaker foams were generated at supercritical conditions (120 and 280 bar, 50°C) using an alpha olefin sulfonate (AOS C14/16 ) surfactant. Lower density difference between CO 2 phase and water, and choice of surfactant were discussed in context to the