2021
DOI: 10.3390/universe7050132
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Properties of Fossil Groups of Galaxies

Abstract: We review the formation and evolution of fossil groups and clusters from both the theoretical and the observational points of view. In the optical band, these systems are dominated by the light of the central galaxy. They were interpreted as old systems that had enough time to merge all the M* galaxies within the central one. During the last two decades, many observational studies were performed to prove the old and relaxed state of fossil systems. The majority of these studies that spans a wide range of topic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 135 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, in this review, we do not make distinction between poor/loose and compact groups, and hereafter we simply refer to them as galaxy groups. The properties of fossil groups are instead discussed in the companion review by Aguerri & Zarattini (2021). However, since the optical properties are not always available, a threshold of M∼10 14 M , corresponding to a temperature of 2-3 keV, is also often used to classify these systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, in this review, we do not make distinction between poor/loose and compact groups, and hereafter we simply refer to them as galaxy groups. The properties of fossil groups are instead discussed in the companion review by Aguerri & Zarattini (2021). However, since the optical properties are not always available, a threshold of M∼10 14 M , corresponding to a temperature of 2-3 keV, is also often used to classify these systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A galaxy group with a large magnitude gap is likely to have assembled its mass at an early epoch. Indeed, fossil groups, which are massive groups observationally selected on the basis of r−band magnitude gap, ∆m 12 > 2 mag and X-ray luminosity L X > 10 42 h −2 50 ergs −1 (Jones et al 2003), are considered to have assembled their mass earlier than non-fossil groups (D'Onghia et al 2005) or have lacked recent infall of new massive satellites (Kundert et al 2017) (See Aguerri & Zarattini (2021) for a recent review on fossil groups). Note that ∆m 12 is largely varied among nearby galaxy groups.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One such class of objects is comprised of fossil groups, which have been studied both observationally and in simulations over the last three decades (studies include e.g. Ponman et al 1994;Vikhlinin et al 1999;Jones et al 2000Jones et al , 2003D'Onghia et al 2005;D'Onghia et al 2007;von Benda-Beckmann et al 2008); for a recent review on FGs, see Aguerri & Zarattini (2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Historically, FGs have been interpreted in various ways, including: 1) that they are not a special class of halos, but rather represent the final stage of mass assembly for all group scale halos (e.g. La Barbera et al 2009;Ponman et al 1994); 2) that they are distinct in constituting the "oldest and most undisturbed galaxy systems not yet absorbed by larger halos" ( Santos et al (2007), see also Ponman et al (1994)); and 3) that FGs are simply "extreme systems produced following the current theory of structure formation in the universe" (Aguerri & Zarattini 2021). Although FGs have been studied for decades, there is still not a firm consensus regarding the place these objects hold in the wider picture of halo formation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%