The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
1981
DOI: 10.1021/j150606a018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Properties of excited tetrakis(sulfonatophenyl)porphyrin in aqueous solutions. Photoredox reactions with quenchers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
26
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
3
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5). It is worth to mention that for the particular case of non-protonated TPPS in the absence of micelles, a great similarity is observed with previous DA results reported in the literature [31]. The observed variation of optical absorption of the solution is caused by the difference between absorption cross-sections assigned to the singlet-singlet (r 01 (k)) and the triplet-triplet (r 34 (k)) transitions.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…5). It is worth to mention that for the particular case of non-protonated TPPS in the absence of micelles, a great similarity is observed with previous DA results reported in the literature [31]. The observed variation of optical absorption of the solution is caused by the difference between absorption cross-sections assigned to the singlet-singlet (r 01 (k)) and the triplet-triplet (r 34 (k)) transitions.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The observed variation of optical absorption of the solution is caused by the difference between absorption cross-sections assigned to the singlet-singlet (r 01 (k)) and the triplet-triplet (r 34 (k)) transitions. The differential optical absorption can be calculated from [28,31]:…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The molar absorption coefficient of 3 TSPP 4-, and of the TSPP 3-• radical at 460 nm, were T ) 65 000 M -1 cm -1 and R ) 21 000 M -1 cm -1 , respectively. 21 The transient absorbance remaining after 4 µs upon quenching of 3 TSPP 4- (Figure 1), due to the absorption by TSPP 3-• , ∆ R A, and measured at 6 µs, was used for the determination of Φ R .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 O 2 overall rate constants (k r + k q ) for compounds 2-5 were measured by flash photolysis by using a system already described in detail. 44,45 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A rough estimation of (k r + k q ) = 2.1 x 10 8 M -1 s -1 was obtained in D 2 O at pH = 7.5 using tetrasodium tetrakis(sulfonatophenyl) porphyrin as a sensitizer of 1 O 2 . 44 This rate constant could not be determined very accurately by this photopphysical method because the screening effect of carminic acid on the absorbance of the photosensitizer restricted the practical range of substrate concentration. Keeping in mind this problem, we may consider that the values obtained by both methods are in reasonably good agreement.…”
Section: Limits Of the Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%