Properties of Concrete and Fiber-Reinforced Concrete for Bases of Road Clothes Based on Secondary Aggregates With Heterogeneous Composition

Abstract

The problem of disposal of concrete scrap of dismantled building structures is relevant for most countries of the world. For Ukraine, this problem is even more acute due to the significant amount of destruction caused by hostilities and rocket attacks. In current research the properties of concrete and fibre-reinforced concrete for the bases of road clothes based on natural and secondary aggregates were compared: granite river gravel, secondary crushed stone with a heterogeneous composition, quartz sand and secondary sand from recycled reinforced concrete structures. CEM III/A slag Portland cement with a blast furnace slag content of 65% and a polycarboxylate type superplasticizer were used. Three series of samples were studied: without fibre; with glass fibre ANTI-CRAK HP 12 (length 12 mm, diameter 0.017 mm, equivalent thread diameter 0.3 mm) in the amount of 1 kg/m3; with polypropylene fibre BeneSteel 55 (length 55 mm, equivalent thread diameter 0.48 mm) in the amount of 4 kg/m3. In each series, concrete on granite gravel and quartz sand, concrete on secondary crushed stone and quartz sand, concrete on secondary crushed stone and secondary sand were studied. The workability of all mixtures was equal to S1. Due to the use of different types of aggregates and fibres, the W/C of concrete mixtures differed significantly. Concretes on secondary aggregates had a higher W/C than on natural aggregates. When using the Anti-Crak HP 12 fibre, the mobility of mixtures with equal W/C increased by 5.5 – 6.9 %. When using BeneSteel 55 fibre, W/C increased by 10.6 – 15.5 %. The type of aggregate had a significant effect on the average density of concrete. When using secondary crushed stone and quartz sand, the average density decreased by 3.8 – 4.6 %. When using secondary crushed stone simultaneously with secondary sand, the average density of concrete decreased by 5.2 – 8.5 %. When using Anti-Crak HP 12 fiber, the average density of concrete decreases by 2 %, when using BeneSteel 55 fibre – up to 4.1 %. Concretes on secondary crushed stone with heterogeneous composition and quartz sand had 4 % higher compressive strength and 2 % higher tensile strength in bending than concretes on granite gravel and similar sand (29.8 MPa and 3.18 MPa, respectively). When secondary crushed stone is used simultaneously with secondary sand, the compressive strength of concrete is only 1.1 % lower than the strength of concrete on natural aggregates, and the tensile strength in bending is 10 % lower. This confirms the possibility of effective use of these concretes for arranging of bases of road clothes. The high-quality performance of secondary aggregates in concrete explains due to their better adhesion to the cement-sand matrix. Dispersed fibre reinforcement with Anti-Crak HP 12 has a positive effect on the compressive strength of concrete on all types of aggregate and increases the tensile strength of concrete on natural aggregates. The use of BeneSteel 55 fibre was not effective due to a significant increase in the W/C of the mixture when it was introduced. In general, taking into account the economic factor, dispersion reinforcement of concrete on secondary aggregates with the types of fibres used in the research is not advisable.