1993
DOI: 10.1029/92wr02430
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Properties of concentration waves in presence of nonlinear sorption, precipitation/dissolution, and homogeneous reactions: 1. Fundamentals

Abstract: Properties of concentration waves of solutes affected by nonlinear sorption, precipitation/ dissolution and homogeneous reactions in the mobile and stationary phases are established when the number of phases is constant. These properties essentially depend on the structure of a stoichiometric matrix which describes the chemical interactions. A reduction procedure of the stoichiometric matrix gives the number of waves or peaks together with their propagation velocities, and the retardation factors of species at… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Parallel column models can also incorporate nonequilibrium, two-site/two-domain concepts [van der Zee, 1990], and preferential flow [van der Zee and Boesten, 1991]. In parallel column models, the transport of constituents in each column or along each streamline is modeled as shock fronts [Helfferich, 1981] or waves [Schweich et al, 1993].…”
Section: Parallel Column Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Parallel column models can also incorporate nonequilibrium, two-site/two-domain concepts [van der Zee, 1990], and preferential flow [van der Zee and Boesten, 1991]. In parallel column models, the transport of constituents in each column or along each streamline is modeled as shock fronts [Helfferich, 1981] or waves [Schweich et al, 1993].…”
Section: Parallel Column Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A typical example for the function g is, assuming the thermodynamically ideal mass action law: g(u; c) = u" (~muc) r (11) where eqn (6) is used. To ensure that c 1 2: 0, c 2 2: 0, only the variable u 2: (elm)+ is allowed, where a+= a for a 2: u, a+ = 0 for a < 0.…”
Section: { U•v•c• For X<omentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proper identification of c and q can be obtained by simple reasoning or more systematically by applying the reduction procedure discussed by Friedly and Rubin [1992] or Schweich et al [1993] to a given problem. Here we shall mainly rely on the first approach as being more chemically intuitive but shall also discuss the more rigorous approach further below.…”
Section: Dq/dc C=c•(c•-c•) + Q(c•) = Q(c•)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Upon a salinity (and possibly a simultaneous p H) change at inlet, the salinity of the solution will adjust itself after one pore volume in a nonretarded front to the final salinity of the solution [Schwelch et al, 1993]. Since the acidity of the surface (concentration on the stationary phase) will remain unaltered after a nonretarded front[Schweich et al, 1993], this salinity front will generally also involve a change in the pH of the solution. After this salinity front, the above arguments apply to the charge density as a function of p H at the appropriate salt level.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%