1995
DOI: 10.1021/bi00001a016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Properties of a Recombinant Human Uracil-DNA Glycosylase from the UNG Gene and Evidence that UNG Encodes the Major Uracil-DNA Glycosylase

Abstract: We have expressed a human recombinant uracil-DNA glycosylase (UNG delta 84) closely resembling the mature form of the human enzyme (UNG, from the UNG gene) in Escherichia coli and purified the protein to apparent homogeneity. This form, which lacks the first seven nonconserved amino acids at the amino terminus, has properties similar to a 50% homogeneous UDG purified from human placenta except for a lower salt optimum and a slightly lower specific activity. The recombinant enzyme removed U from ssDNA approxima… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
252
2

Year Published

1996
1996
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 253 publications
(270 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
16
252
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The rate differs as much as 20-fold between the ' best ' (A\T\UAA) and ' worst ' (G\CUG\C\T) sequences. Usually, but not always [34], the rate of removal is greater from U\G mispairs than from U :A pairs [35][36][37]. A low removal rate tends to be correlated with the occurrence of ' hot spots ' for mutation [36], similar to the correlation between slow spots for the repair of cyclobutyl dimers and hot spots for mutations [38,39].…”
Section: Udgsmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The rate differs as much as 20-fold between the ' best ' (A\T\UAA) and ' worst ' (G\CUG\C\T) sequences. Usually, but not always [34], the rate of removal is greater from U\G mispairs than from U :A pairs [35][36][37]. A low removal rate tends to be correlated with the occurrence of ' hot spots ' for mutation [36], similar to the correlation between slow spots for the repair of cyclobutyl dimers and hot spots for mutations [38,39].…”
Section: Udgsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Ugi forms an essentially irreversible complex with UDG [68,69], and the specificity of the interaction [70,71] indicates that only structurally related UDGs will bind to Ugi. Furthermore, antibodies raised against homogeneous human UDG detected both mitochondrial and nuclear forms, indicating that these forms are closely related [37,64,72].…”
Section: Similarities Between the Nuclear And Mitochondrial Forms Of Udgmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The core catalytic domain of UNG (UNGΔ84), which lacks the N-terminal 84 amino acids of UNG2 [5], was overproduced in E. coli and purified as described by Chen et al [35]. PCNA LC59 was overproduced in E. coli BL21 (DE3) and purified as described previously for wild-type PCNA, except that the LC59 double mutant flowed through, rather than binding to, the phenyl-Sepharose column [32].…”
Section: Protein Purificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…required for subcellular sorting, while the core catalytic domain (UNGΔ84) is common to the two forms [3,4]. All forms of UNG examined remove uracil opposite A or G in doublestranded DNA as well as from single-stranded DNA [3,5]. At least four different human nuclear DNA glycosylases, UNG2, single-strand selective monofunctional uracil-DNA glycosylase (SMUG1), thymine-DNA glycosylase (TDG) and methyl-CpG binding domain protein 4 (MBD4, also known as MED1) have been reported to removal uracil from U·G mispairs [6][7][8], and it has not yet been determined whether the different uracil-DNA glycosylases have distinct or overlapping physiological functions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…UNG proteins are relatively small monomeric proteins that usually do not require cofactors or ions for their activity. They are also highly specific against uracil in both single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) and double-stranded DNA (dsDNA), with a preference for ssDNA (64,75).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%