Properties, Effects, Residues, and Analytics of the Insecticide Endosulfan 1982
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4612-5712-7_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Properties, effects, residues, and analytics of the insecticide Endosulfan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
55
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 120 publications
3
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This confirms the results by Pronk et al [33] whereby neutral compounds were assumed to sorb to both AEMs and CEMs. Above pH 10, ES degradation results from cleavage of the cyclic sulfite group [10] leading to the formation of ES diol. This process is accelerated by NaOH addition.…”
Section: Endosulfan Sorption In Electrodialysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This confirms the results by Pronk et al [33] whereby neutral compounds were assumed to sorb to both AEMs and CEMs. Above pH 10, ES degradation results from cleavage of the cyclic sulfite group [10] leading to the formation of ES diol. This process is accelerated by NaOH addition.…”
Section: Endosulfan Sorption In Electrodialysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is used in many countries throughout the world for the control of pests on fruits, vegetables, tea, tobacco, and cotton (Antonious and Byers, 1997;Sethunathan et al, 2002). Because of such abundant usage, and the potential for accumulation in the environment (endosulfan is not readily detoxified by soil microorganisms), residues are detectable in soils, sediments, and crops at harvest time (Goebel et al, 1982;U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 1990).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it has a relatively reactive cyclic sulfite diester group and can serve as a good sulfur source (Sutherland et al, 2000). The removal of sulfur moiety from the endosulfan substantially reduced its vertabrate toxicity and therefore helped in detoxification of the compound (Goebel et al, 1982;Singh and Singh, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it has a relatively reactive cyclic sulfite diester group and can serve as a good sulfur source (Sutherland et al, 2000). The removal of sulfur moiety from the endosulfan substantially reduced its vertabrate toxicity and therefore helped in detoxification of the compound (Goebel et al, 1982;Singh and Singh, 2011).The isolated bacterial strains could degrade about 56.7-88.5% of 100 mg/l of α-endosulfan in 10 days of incubation. The difference in degradation capability of various strains may be due to difference in enzyme system and/or difference in their growth rate (Bhattacharjee et al, 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%