Properties, categories, and categorisation

Abstract

We re-evaluate existing data that demonstrate a large amount of variability in the content of categories considering the fact that these data have been obtained in a specific task: the production of features of single isolated categories. We present new data that reveal a large consensus when participants have to judge whether or not a given feature is characteristic of a category and we show that classification tasks produce an intermediate level of consensus. We argue that the differences observed between tasks are due to the extent of implied context and we propose a reinterpretation of typicality effects, demonstrating that they are compatible with the existence of a stable conceptual core. In order to explain how the existence of a conceptual core is consistent with variability due to context, we present a theory of categorisation based on a property tree organisation. Within a domain of description, we distinguish between semantic implications (flying ? moving) and empirical implications (flying ? having wings) as well as between properties used to describe objects. Semantic implications serve to build property lines and Galois lattices are used to reveal category structures according to empirical implications. We show that variability in the category content may be explained by the fact that some properties are emphasised while others are masked according to the context.

Semantic and perceptive organisation of Sauvignon blanc wine characteristics: Influence of expertise

“…When studying how flavours or aromas are conceptualised and categorised, an alternate method for considering the data from the usual multi-dimensional space is to consider a tree structure (Lawless, 1997, p. 161). A tree structure gives an hierarchical structure that is broad and flat like a two-dimensional map, and contains super-ordinate nodes with degrees of nesting, based on semantic networks of categories and properties (Poitrenaud, Richard, & Tijus, 2005). Urdapilleta et al (2006), in a study of odour classification using floral fragrances and treestructure methodology, demonstrated that olfactory properties were classified as an hierarchically-arranged semantic network when participants were instructed to sort olfactory terms as a function of their specificity or generality.…”

Know-How modelling for e-Learning

“…Fourth module is the cognitive and goal-oriented KnowHow module that is the built-in [mental model] of the task, made of the sub-goals structure, linking sub-goals to objects (not the reverse according to the object primacy [21]). This mental model, of a schema form, entails heuristics, inferences and planning by both top-down (the task goal) and bottom-up processes (perception of task objects) by simultaneously establishing the causal links between objects and the sub-goals structure.…”

The Creative Analytic Paradigm and Generative Social Research within the Context of the Early-Years/Kindergarten Physical Learning Environment

“…Even a cursory review of literature in the area of categorisation theory [12,19,30,33,39,48,50] is enough to recognise that this is a difficult and complex topic. The normative nature of quantitative and qualitative research was highlighted by Creswell [10] who emphasised that the utility of 'quantitative' and 'qualitative' as descriptors of research has tended to be rejected by mixed methods researchers 'in favour of a continuum for presenting qualitative and quantitative differences' (p. 273).…”