2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0039-6028(02)02249-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Properly interpreting scanning tunneling microscopy images: the Cu()-c(2×2)N surface revisited

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further examinination of a vertical cross section of the electrostatic potential along the dimer axis (Figure 2f) illustrates how the intermediate missing row distorts the valence electron orbitals of the oxygen atoms, leading to the dimer-like charge density. As shown by Wofford et al, 40 the…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Further examinination of a vertical cross section of the electrostatic potential along the dimer axis (Figure 2f) illustrates how the intermediate missing row distorts the valence electron orbitals of the oxygen atoms, leading to the dimer-like charge density. As shown by Wofford et al, 40 the…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Thus, the lingering issue of this system has been the structure of the first layer Cu atoms and the interpretation of its STM images. While it was proposed that the bright spots in the STM images may be just distortions, not the image of Cu atoms that can be caused by the STM tip with an asymmetric apex [28], recently simulated STM images showed that the bright spots were N atoms. As interpretation of STM measurements may not be unique, calculations of surface stress and surface phonon dispersion provide alternate ways of verifying these conclusions.…”
Section: Adsorbate Induced Stress On Ni(001) and Cu(001)mentioning
confidence: 99%