2001
DOI: 10.1002/pds.656
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Propensity score methods in drug safety studies: practice, strengths and limitations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
33
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A propensity score estimating the probability of a patient receiving tamoxifen was calculated using a logistic regression model for age, social class, pathological tumour characteristics, Charlson's index and co-prescribing (Wang and Donnan, 2001). This was added to the model to adjust for propensity to receive tamoxifen and so reduce bias in the survival analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A propensity score estimating the probability of a patient receiving tamoxifen was calculated using a logistic regression model for age, social class, pathological tumour characteristics, Charlson's index and co-prescribing (Wang and Donnan, 2001). This was added to the model to adjust for propensity to receive tamoxifen and so reduce bias in the survival analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of the propensity score within the final model helps reduce potential selection bias (Wang and Donnan, 2001) because of the use of observational data, where clinicians may choose patients with a lower risk of mortality to receive tamoxifen. However, our analysis holds after allowing for the predisposition of a patient to receive tamoxifen.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ORs did not differ significantly across the two survey samples (P \ .81), verifying our decision to combine the two surveys. To control for possible residual confounding from demographic and health factors and to incorporate a number of covariates in our model without consuming excessive degrees of freedom, we used member characteristics to generate propensity scores (Braitman and Rosenbaum 2002;Wang and Donnan 2001). Using logistic regression, we generated a propensity score for each member, modeling antidepressant treatment (adequate versus inadequate) from the following covariates: age, gender, race, marital status, education level, receipt of SSI/SSDI, self-reported disabling condition and health status (C-statistic = 0.64).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Confounding adjustment by baseline covariates (L(0)) using standard modeling approaches or causal methods for point treatment problems (e.g., propensity score [14][15][16][17] ) can then provide unbiased estimates of the effect of the early therapy exposure (A(0)). Such results are especially useful in studies (e.g., randomized trials) in which changes in therapies are uncommon during the follow-up time, that is, an intention-to-treat (ITT) interpretation of the results is informative.…”
Section: Motivation For Marginal Structural Model Approaches In Compamentioning
confidence: 99%