2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-018-06609-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Propensity score-matched comparison of short-term and long-term outcomes between endoscopic submucosal dissection and surgery for treatment of early gastric cancer in a Western setting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Globally, the procedures for endoscopic resection, such as polypectomy, endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), are widely performed 1–3 . Endoscopic resection is gaining increasing attention and acceptance in Japan and Western countries 4–9 . However, the benefits and risks often coexist.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Globally, the procedures for endoscopic resection, such as polypectomy, endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), are widely performed 1–3 . Endoscopic resection is gaining increasing attention and acceptance in Japan and Western countries 4–9 . However, the benefits and risks often coexist.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, minimally invasive procedures such as endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), and endoscopic mucosal dissection (EMD) are becoming increasingly frequent in early gastric cancer without lymph node metastasis, [85] as they are physiologically less stressful, resulting in a shorter postoperative hospital stay and has a lower postoperative morbidity rate. There was no difference in survival between the 2 methods in a study comparing curative ESD/EMD and gastrectomy [85] . The major risk of ESD is that pathological N status is not determined, because lymph node resection is not performed [86] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In comparison, multicenter studies of ESD for EGC at Eastern institutions have reported similar en bloc resection rates of 92.7-96.1% and R0 resection rates of 82.6-94.5% with bleeding rates of 0.6-9.9% and perforation rates of 3.6-4.7% [31]. In a retrospective case-control study including 260 western EGC patients, ESD could significantly reduce the operation time and postoperative hospitalization stay, and prolong 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) (All P < 0.05) [32]. However, a retrospective analysis based on the National Cancer Database indicated that endoscopic resection was inferior in terms of prognosis for cT1aN0 and cT1bN0 GC when compared with gastrectomy and suggested that a construction of a subset considering the risk of LN metastasis was beneficial to prolong EGC patients' survival from endoscopic resection [33].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%