2022
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1009298
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Propensity score-matched comparison of robotic- and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, and open lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer patients aged 75 years or older

Abstract: Introduction: Although robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) has been widely applied in treating non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), its advantages remain unclear for very old patients. The present study compared the perioperative outcomes and survival profiles among RATS, video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS), and open lobectomy (OL), aiming to access the superiority of RATS for NSCLC patients aged ≥75 years.Methods: Pathological IA-IIIB NSCLC patients aged ≥75 years who underwent RATS, VATS, or O… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
26
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(27 reference statements)
2
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, the result of the sensitivity analysis showed no substantive differences when compared with the primary analysis in terms of pain score at 24 h and morphine equivalent consumption at 48 h. Differently from the primary analysis, the sensitivity analysis conducted using only studies with minimally invasive surgical technique and excluding the Davine, investigation [ 19 ] in which less than 20% of patients received a thoracotomy, showed a trend to a shorter LOS in favor of OFA. It is reasonable that, as the minimally invasive settings are associated with lower inpatient stay than an open approach [ 34 ], further decrease of LOS is hard to achieve by pharmacological protocols. In practice, the surgical technique affects LOS much more than the pharmacological strategies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the result of the sensitivity analysis showed no substantive differences when compared with the primary analysis in terms of pain score at 24 h and morphine equivalent consumption at 48 h. Differently from the primary analysis, the sensitivity analysis conducted using only studies with minimally invasive surgical technique and excluding the Davine, investigation [ 19 ] in which less than 20% of patients received a thoracotomy, showed a trend to a shorter LOS in favor of OFA. It is reasonable that, as the minimally invasive settings are associated with lower inpatient stay than an open approach [ 34 ], further decrease of LOS is hard to achieve by pharmacological protocols. In practice, the surgical technique affects LOS much more than the pharmacological strategies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More specifically, the advantages of robotic surgery have been widely investigated in the recent past; nowadays, robotic lobectomy represents the gold standard in the treatment of early lung cancer, being feasible and safe, with clinical outcomes similar, or in some cases superior, to those of video-assisted thoracoscopic or open surgery [ 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, robotic lobectomy is considered an achievable and safe procedure [ 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 ], with clinical and oncological outcomes comparable to those of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS)/thoracotomy, both in early [ 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 ] and in advanced stages (II-IIIA NSCLC) with no differences in medium and long-term survival [ 10 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The application of VATS in lung cancer surgery is well established, but VATS has some shortcomings: long learning curve, counterintuitive operation logic, lack of stereoscopic view, and poor instrument mobility, etc. The application of robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) can further solve these problems [4,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%