DOI: 10.18297/etd/2504
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Propensity score based methods for estimating the treatment effects based on observational studies.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
(18 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our early investigation, we ensembled GPS estimation models by using rank aggregation and bootstrap methods. 30 However, the ensembled GPS method did not generate much improved ATE estimates. The enDR developed in this article coupled with the optimal GPS method (ie, Opt MinMax ) provided much improved estimates for ATEs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our early investigation, we ensembled GPS estimation models by using rank aggregation and bootstrap methods. 30 However, the ensembled GPS method did not generate much improved ATE estimates. The enDR developed in this article coupled with the optimal GPS method (ie, Opt MinMax ) provided much improved estimates for ATEs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…However, the random forest has the worst covariate balance (see Figures and S3), resulting in highly biased estimators for ATEs. In our early investigation, we ensembled GPS estimation models by using rank aggregation and bootstrap methods . However, the ensembled GPS method did not generate much improved ATE estimates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case study based on the MarketScan dataset, the random forest has a slightly larger correct classification rate (0.479) than the multinomial logistic regression model In our early investigation, we ensembled GPS estimation models by using rank aggregation and bootstrap methods (Abdia, 2016). However, the ensembled GPS method did not generate much improved ATE estimates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%