Abstract:The aim of this study was to examine if a propeller thoracodorsal artery perforator (TAP) flap can be used for breast reconstruction. Fifteen women were reconstructed using a propeller TAP flap, an implant, and an ADM. Preoperative colour Doppler ultrasonography was used for patient selection to identify the dominant perforator in all cases. A total of 16 TAP flaps were performed; 12 flaps were based on one perforator and four were based on two. A permanent silicone implant was used in 14 cases and an expander… Show more
“…Since 2011 the propeller TAP flap has increasingly been replacing the classic LD flap in our practice for delayed breast reconstruction where muscle is not required [4][5][6][7][8] . This is largely due to the surgical modifications described in this article.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a few cases a small back-cut into the anterior edge of the LD muscle is necessary to enable In the course of time our flap insertion has changed as well. Initially, we inserted the flap where the mastectomy scar was located to replace the missing breast mound 4,5 . However, we have noticed that the best recipient site for the flap is the lateral and inferior part of the intended breast reconstruction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We introduced the TAPIA (Thoracodorsal artery perforator flap, implant and acellular dermal matrix) concept, shortly after the introduction of acellular dermal matrix (ADM) in Europe in 2011; a combined use of a propeller TAP flap, an ADM and an implant for delayed breast reconstruction 4,5 . The use of preoperative color Doppler ultrasound (CDU) for perforator localization has enabled us to modify the design of our flap over time 6 .…”
“…Since 2011 the propeller TAP flap has increasingly been replacing the classic LD flap in our practice for delayed breast reconstruction where muscle is not required [4][5][6][7][8] . This is largely due to the surgical modifications described in this article.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a few cases a small back-cut into the anterior edge of the LD muscle is necessary to enable In the course of time our flap insertion has changed as well. Initially, we inserted the flap where the mastectomy scar was located to replace the missing breast mound 4,5 . However, we have noticed that the best recipient site for the flap is the lateral and inferior part of the intended breast reconstruction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We introduced the TAPIA (Thoracodorsal artery perforator flap, implant and acellular dermal matrix) concept, shortly after the introduction of acellular dermal matrix (ADM) in Europe in 2011; a combined use of a propeller TAP flap, an ADM and an implant for delayed breast reconstruction 4,5 . The use of preoperative color Doppler ultrasound (CDU) for perforator localization has enabled us to modify the design of our flap over time 6 .…”
“…The first eight delayed breast reconstructions were performed with meticulous dissection of the thoracodorsal perforator as previously described in detail by Thomsen et al 26 Hereafter, the technique was modified to a simpler approach. The new surgical procedure was carried out as follows: All patients were screened using color Doppler ultrasonography to identify the most cranially located perforator(s) from the thoracodorsal artery (Video 1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26 The goal of combining the TAP flap with an ADM is to create an internal bra supporting the implant and thus preventing any displacement. Furthermore, the ADM works as a substitute of the latissimus muscle to create a biocapsule and it seems to be beneficial for this "shape-and-drape" technique.…”
Background: Perforator propeller flaps (PPFs) have been widely used due to their numerous advantages; however, they were also associated with various complications. Herein, we analyzed the risk factors for complications of PPFs used for soft tissue reconstruction after malignant tumor resection.
Methods:We searched databases for articles on soft tissue reconstruction using PPFs after malignant tumor resection published between January 1991 and April 2021. Studies were selected according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement. Fixed effects models and relative risks were used for data analysis. Funnel plots and Begg's test were used to evaluate publication bias.Results: Twenty-six articles met the inclusion criteria. Complications were found in 24.7% of all patients. The four significant risk factors were age equal or older than 60 years (pooled relative risk, 1.83; p = .04), smoking (pooled relative risk, 2.32; p = .03), diabetes (pooled relative risk, 2.59; p = .01) and radiotherapy (pooled relative risk, 2.09; p = .01). Hypertension, defects located in the extremities, flap size equal or greater than 100 cm 2 , and pedicle rotation equal or greater than 120 degrees were not significant risk factors for complications. No publication bias was found in the included articles.
Conclusion:Age equal or older than 60 years, smoking, diabetes and radiotherapy are four risk factors for complications when PPFs are used to reconstruct soft tissue defects resulting from malignant tumor resection.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.