2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11244-014-0280-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Propane Ammoxidation over Mo–V–Te–Nb–O M1 Phase Investigated by DFT: Elementary Steps of Ammonia Adsorption, Activation and NH Insertion into π-Allyl Intermediate

Abstract: The selective ammoxidation of propane into acrylonitrile catalyzed by the bulk Mo-V-Te-Nb-O system has received significant attention because it is more environmentally benign than the current process of propene ammoxidation and relies on more abundant propane feedstock. The reaction mechanism is proposed to consist of a series of elementary steps including propane oxidative dehydrogenation, ammonia and O 2 activation, and NH x insertion into C 3 intermediates. In this study density functional theory calculati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…50,52 Although these results agree with the experimental finding that the MMOs of the type MoVTe(Nb)O with Te are catalytically more active than the simple MoVO system, 17 the barriers calculated at the GGA level agree only rather qualitatively with the experimentally determined values of 131 kJ mol −1 for MoVTeNbO, and 105 kJ mol −1 for MoVTeO. 53 In anticipation of section 3.1.2, we point out here that the nature of the functional is not the only critical issue when evaluating reaction barriers. 53 Analyzing the reactions of NH x species and C-N bond formation steps, it was shown, in accordance with experiment, that these steps are not crucial for the overall kinetics of the process.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 61%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…50,52 Although these results agree with the experimental finding that the MMOs of the type MoVTe(Nb)O with Te are catalytically more active than the simple MoVO system, 17 the barriers calculated at the GGA level agree only rather qualitatively with the experimentally determined values of 131 kJ mol −1 for MoVTeNbO, and 105 kJ mol −1 for MoVTeO. 53 In anticipation of section 3.1.2, we point out here that the nature of the functional is not the only critical issue when evaluating reaction barriers. 53 Analyzing the reactions of NH x species and C-N bond formation steps, it was shown, in accordance with experiment, that these steps are not crucial for the overall kinetics of the process.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 61%
“…The reaction at the surface VvO group is reported to be associated with a barrier in the range 164-206 kJ mol −1 , depending on the structure adjacent to the V center, while the barrier of the dehydrogenation at the TevO group was calculated in the range 53-97 kJ mol −1 . 53 Analyzing the reactions of NH x species and C-N bond formation steps, it was shown, in accordance with experiment, that these steps are not crucial for the overall kinetics of the process. 17 More recently, efforts towards a characterization of the full catalytic cycle of the ammoxidation process have been made with the same computational methods.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The different catalytic behaviors of these sites in Mo-V-O and Mo-V-Te-Nb-O systems can be attributed to the different locations of V +5 sites [55]. DFT studies, however, indicate that that the reduced Mo is the most favorable site for ammonia activation [56], whereas Te is more active than V for the H abstraction from propane [57].…”
Section: Propane Ammoxidation To Acrylonitrilementioning
confidence: 99%