2006
DOI: 10.1080/00102200500290690
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Propagation, Structure, and Limit Phenomena of Laminar Flames at Elevated Pressures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the (adiabatic) flame temperature T f increases only slightly with increasing pressure [23], this density ratio is nearly pressure independent. Consequently, the upward velocity v and hence the flame stretch rate K are likewise nearly pressure independent.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Since the (adiabatic) flame temperature T f increases only slightly with increasing pressure [23], this density ratio is nearly pressure independent. Consequently, the upward velocity v and hence the flame stretch rate K are likewise nearly pressure independent.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The planar flame, the simplest form of combustion illustrating the propagating nature of premixed flames, is amenable to analysis that provides fundamental understanding of the intrinsic instabilities observed in laboratory experiments; see for example Markstein (1951), Palm-Lewis & Strehlow (1969), Groff (1982), Sivashinsky (1983), Clavin (1985), Bradley et al (2000) and Bradley, Cresswell & Puttock (2001), Law (2006) and Matalon (2007). Excluding acoustic and buoyancy effects, a planar premixed flame can be rendered unstable by hydrodynamic and thermodiffusive mechanisms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LFL given in EN 1839 (B) standard is 4.0 mol% H 2 . The important discrepancy between lower flammability limits is due to the very particular behavior of the hydrogen flame specially in lean mixtures [51,52]. The difference between values of Bone et al and the ones of Coward and Jones is essentially due to the limit definition.…”
Section: Safe Methods 4211 Lean Mixtures Hydrogen Is Introduced Imentioning
confidence: 96%