2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-012-4715-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Propagation of assembly errors in multitasking machines by the homogenous matrix method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By assuming that all the local compliance indices are equal to 10 5 , and picking five sampling points in the workspace, the result of structural stiffness analysis is listed in Table 8 for all 15 solutions. A similar idea was presented in [29] for multitasking machines. Generally, the system stiffness should fall under the standard value of machine tools, i.e., >0.1N/nm, depending on the required accuracy.…”
Section: S/n Cad Modelmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…By assuming that all the local compliance indices are equal to 10 5 , and picking five sampling points in the workspace, the result of structural stiffness analysis is listed in Table 8 for all 15 solutions. A similar idea was presented in [29] for multitasking machines. Generally, the system stiffness should fall under the standard value of machine tools, i.e., >0.1N/nm, depending on the required accuracy.…”
Section: S/n Cad Modelmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Chen et al, [14] proposed a method for modeling and compensating the geometric error of large grinders based on the D-H method. Diaz-Tena et al [15] presented a method to estimate the geometrical accuracy of a multi-axis machines by using a homogenous matrix. Fu [16] considered the geometric meaning of perpendicularity error and improved the accuracy of five-axis machine tool geometric error by improving the D-H modeling method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lack of accuracy observed in workpieces is due to several systematic machine errors: kinematic and thermally induced effects are the major contributors. The source of the kinematic errors are mainly machine tool part geometry and misalignment of the different guideways and rotary axis [1,2]. In the workshop, the direct environment of a machine tool can significantly influence the thermal behavior of its structure [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%