1942
DOI: 10.1086/219125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Propaganda Analysis-To What Ends?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ironic for an institution focusing attention on rhetoric instead of political economic structure, the IPA suspended its operations in order to preserve national unity, and many of its members transitioned to war communication work. Garber (1942) criticised the movement for having fostered "cheap skepticism" and undermining holistic reasoning and the place of value judgement in analysis. Riegel (1935) voiced similar concerns over the spread of what he described as "propagantitis", with those infected no longer judging information on its own merit but instead seeing political manipulation in all communication.…”
Section: Propagandamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ironic for an institution focusing attention on rhetoric instead of political economic structure, the IPA suspended its operations in order to preserve national unity, and many of its members transitioned to war communication work. Garber (1942) criticised the movement for having fostered "cheap skepticism" and undermining holistic reasoning and the place of value judgement in analysis. Riegel (1935) voiced similar concerns over the spread of what he described as "propagantitis", with those infected no longer judging information on its own merit but instead seeing political manipulation in all communication.…”
Section: Propagandamentioning
confidence: 99%