The Cambridge History of Seventeenth-Century Philosophy 2000
DOI: 10.1017/chol9780521307635.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proofs of the existence of God

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 434 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was certainly not the case that the pursuit of an enhanced knowledge of nature had played an insignificant part in the growth either of the physical endowment or of the intellectual ambition of the universities, particularly of Oxford, in the years before 1641. 9 See Feingold 1997a;Feingold 1997b;Feingold 1998;Costello 1958, 80-1;Lohr 1988 andMaclean 2005 and2006, 20-7;Wallace 1988;Armogathe 1998. giuen us to knowe god by is much more legible (now) & lesse dangerous, then [th]e old blotted booke of [th]e creation. Thus, at both Oxford and Cambridge, the teaching of natural philosophy, or physics (physica), proceeded from established philosophical truths about matter, through a study of inanimate and animate nature, eventually to concern with the soul.…”
Section: Responses To Radicalismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was certainly not the case that the pursuit of an enhanced knowledge of nature had played an insignificant part in the growth either of the physical endowment or of the intellectual ambition of the universities, particularly of Oxford, in the years before 1641. 9 See Feingold 1997a;Feingold 1997b;Feingold 1998;Costello 1958, 80-1;Lohr 1988 andMaclean 2005 and2006, 20-7;Wallace 1988;Armogathe 1998. giuen us to knowe god by is much more legible (now) & lesse dangerous, then [th]e old blotted booke of [th]e creation. Thus, at both Oxford and Cambridge, the teaching of natural philosophy, or physics (physica), proceeded from established philosophical truths about matter, through a study of inanimate and animate nature, eventually to concern with the soul.…”
Section: Responses To Radicalismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 See (Armogathe 1998). 6 "[The ontological argument] could not have any force for an atheist, who would not allow himself to be convinced by it. Indeed, it is not suitable for this purpose, and the author does not wish to be understood in this way.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%