2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11225-019-09876-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proof Theory of Paraconsistent Weak Kleene Logic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given these results, one may conjecture that the logics induced by applying these standards for logical consequence over there weak Kleene algebra and, respectively, the Sobociński algebra will be similarly related. To this extent, we may confirm that such a connection between wST and PWK has been recently established in [25]. Whether it is possible to produce similar proofs for the case of the remaining systems is as of today, yet to be determined.…”
Section: ϕ ⇒ ϕmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…Given these results, one may conjecture that the logics induced by applying these standards for logical consequence over there weak Kleene algebra and, respectively, the Sobociński algebra will be similarly related. To this extent, we may confirm that such a connection between wST and PWK has been recently established in [25]. Whether it is possible to produce similar proofs for the case of the remaining systems is as of today, yet to be determined.…”
Section: ϕ ⇒ ϕmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…In this respect, a crucial thing to highlight is that the operations of this algebra induce two different semilattice orders which cannot be identified. Indeed, WK is an instance of a generalised involutive bisemilattice as defined in [32,33], whose meet-induced semilattice order ≤ ∧ differs from the join-induced semilattice order ≤ ∨ , as it can be seen in Figure 3.…”
Section: Semanticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To wit, if the matrix in question is a proper p-matrix but not a regular matrix, one may wonder whether the resulting logic will be identical to CL, or if it will differ with this system in some respect. Lengthy debates have been had in the past few years in this regard, mostly revolving around the logic ST defended by Cobreros, Egré, Ripley and van Rooij in many works-some of which include [9], [8], [10], [11], [34] and [35]. For future reference, the logic ST is induced by the p-matrix SK, {t}, {t, n} built on top of the 3-element strong Kleene algebra SK from S. Kleene's [26], whose carrier set is {t, n, f } and whose characteristic operations can be presented in the form of the "truth-tables" appearing in Figure 1.…”
Section: Semanticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This alternative option is built on top of the 3-element weak Kleene algebra WK-instead of the aforementioned strong Kleene algebra. Thus, either implicitly or explicitly it is possible to find semantics along these lines in F. Correia's [13], F. Paoli and M. Pra Baldi's [32] and in our own [42]. In order for things to be clear in what follows, let us state here that the WK algebra is the structure whose carrier set is {t, e, f } and whose characteristic operations can be presented in the form of the "truth-tables" appearing in Figure 2.…”
Section: Semanticsmentioning
confidence: 99%