1978
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.18.7165
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proof thatEni=εin density-functional theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

20
963
0
15

Year Published

1997
1997
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,947 publications
(1,024 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
20
963
0
15
Order By: Relevance
“…The only exception is for the HOMO level, which is equal to the negative of the ionization potential. [39][40][41] It has been demonstrated experimentally [42][43][44][45][46] that the quasi-particle energy gap, E gap QP , of a molecule, defined as the difference between its ionization potential, I, and electron affinity, A, shrinks with respect to that of the gas phase by adsorbing the molecule on a polarizable substrate. Nevertheless, the electronic structure theories usually used for such calculations can only partly account for this renormalization of the molecular energy levels when the junction is formed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The only exception is for the HOMO level, which is equal to the negative of the ionization potential. [39][40][41] It has been demonstrated experimentally [42][43][44][45][46] that the quasi-particle energy gap, E gap QP , of a molecule, defined as the difference between its ionization potential, I, and electron affinity, A, shrinks with respect to that of the gas phase by adsorbing the molecule on a polarizable substrate. Nevertheless, the electronic structure theories usually used for such calculations can only partly account for this renormalization of the molecular energy levels when the junction is formed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, for a system with N = M + f electrons, ∂ E ∂ N equals the negative of the exact vertical electron affinity of the M-electron system, denoted A M 0 , again independent of f . From Janak's theorem, 17 ∂ E ∂ N equals the energy of the Kohn-Sham orbital whose occupation is varying. It follows that…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perdew et al 6 showed for an atom of nuclear charge Z that with IP the ionization potential, EA the electron affinity, N a continuous variable representing the total number of electrons, and µ ) ∂E/∂N the first derivative of the total energy (E) with respect to N, the chemical potential. Earlier, Janak proved that 7 where n i is the occupation number of the KS orbital ψ i and i is the corresponding KS orbital energy. On the basis of eqs 1 and 2, Perdew et al obtained 6 in which max represents the maximum occupied KS orbital energy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%