1983
DOI: 10.1080/01449298308914479
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proof-reading texts on screen and paper

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0
4

Year Published

1985
1985
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
32
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Since reading is significantly different in the printed media versus the electronic media [52,81], research findings on the traditional printed media need to be applied with care to the electronic media. In this study, we have used the competition-for-attention theory, originating from the marketing literature, to understand the effect of two information formats on consumers' shopping performance in the e-commerce domain.…”
Section: Implications For Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since reading is significantly different in the printed media versus the electronic media [52,81], research findings on the traditional printed media need to be applied with care to the electronic media. In this study, we have used the competition-for-attention theory, originating from the marketing literature, to understand the effect of two information formats on consumers' shopping performance in the e-commerce domain.…”
Section: Implications For Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Readability refers to the extent to which text is legible. It is an important dimension as different studies have shown that reading from a computer screen may be slower and less accurate [47,66]. Speed refers to time spent in loading and displaying the site.…”
Section: Organizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wright and Lickorish [1983] studied the speed and accuracy of proofreading a text for errors with 32 subjects who read from both a CRT and paper. The CRT was a 12-inch (in.)…”
Section: Organizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of these studies have revealed no differences between paper and computer screen presentation [Askwall 1985;Keenan 19841, whereas others have revealed only minimal differences [Kak 1981;Switchenko 19841. The results of these studies are in sharp contrast to the results of a number of others that have found large and significant differences between paper and screen presentation. Wright and Lickorish [1983] studied the speed and accuracy of proofreading a text for errors with 32 subjects who read from both a CRT and paper. The CRT was a 12-inch (in.)…”
Section: Organizationmentioning
confidence: 99%