2012
DOI: 10.1109/tsp.2012.2195660
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proof of Convergence and Performance Analysis for Sparse Recovery via Zero-Point Attracting Projection

Abstract: A recursive algorithm named Zero-point Attracting Projection (ZAP) is proposed recently for sparse signal reconstruction. Compared with the reference algorithms, ZAP demonstrates rather good performance in recovery precision and robustness. However, any theoretical analysis about the mentioned algorithm, even a proof on its convergence, is not available. In this work, a strict proof on the convergence of ZAP is provided and the condition of convergence is put forward. Based on the theoretical analysis, it is f… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, using (10) and 11the 1D ZALMS can be used as a 2D-ZALMS algorithm in (12) and the update equation becomes:…”
Section: Extending To the 2d Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, using (10) and 11the 1D ZALMS can be used as a 2D-ZALMS algorithm in (12) and the update equation becomes:…”
Section: Extending To the 2d Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…where U I was defined in (15). Clearly U c I is of measure zero and of the first category for each I , so is S c , a finite union of them.…”
Section: B Equivalence Regained: J \ R J Is Zero Measure and Meagrementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the non-convex nature of these cost functions makes it difficult to exactly solve the corresponding optimization problems, various practical algorithms can be adapted to these non-convex problems, including the iteratively re-weighted least squares minimization (IRLS) [12], [13], iterative thresholding algorithm (IT) [14], which are based on fixed point iteration; and the zero point attracting projection algorithm (ZAP) [3], [15], [16], which is based on Newton's method for solving nonlinear optimization. In general the non-convex algorithms have empirically outperformed BP in the various respects, because nonlinear cost functions can better promote sparsity than the 1 cost function.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many engineering and mathematics problems, sparsity is a popular topic [4]. In system identification and communication applications, the system may be in sparse nature [5] such as acoustic echo cancellation and network cancellation applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%