2014
DOI: 10.1002/gamm.201410011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prony methods for recovery of structured functions

Abstract: In this survey, we describe the classical Prony method and whose relatives. We sketch a frequently used Prony–like method for equispaced sampled data, namely the ESPRIT method. The case of nonequispaced sampled data is discussed too. For the reconstruction of a sparse eigenfunction expansion, a generalized Prony method is presented. The Prony methods are applied to the recovery of structured functions (such as exponential sums and extended exponential sums) and of sparse vectors. The recovery of spline functio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
75
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
75
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, in spite of the huge bibliography related to the Prony method and general amplitude and frequency sums (see [2,3,5,12,20,23,24] and references therein), we could not find any more or less general estimates for amplitudes and frequencies similar to those in Theorem 5. Probably, they just do not exist because of the above-mentioned divergence examples from [12, Section 7] and the results from [2].…”
Section: Comparison With the Original Prony Exponential Interpolationmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Furthermore, in spite of the huge bibliography related to the Prony method and general amplitude and frequency sums (see [2,3,5,12,20,23,24] and references therein), we could not find any more or less general estimates for amplitudes and frequencies similar to those in Theorem 5. Probably, they just do not exist because of the above-mentioned divergence examples from [12, Section 7] and the results from [2].…”
Section: Comparison With the Original Prony Exponential Interpolationmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…, 2M − 1, exact recovery is possible if T j ∈ R + i[−π, π), see e.g. [18]. Usually, we assume that there is an a priori known bound C such that Im T j ∈ [−Cπ, Cπ), and the parameters T j can still be recovered using a rescaling argument and taking sampling values f (kh) with h ≤ 1/C instead of for the vector p = (p 0 , .…”
Section: Prony's Methods Based On the Shift Operatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, at this stage, the bijective mapping between ℓ > 0 and (j, k) with j > k such that τ ℓ = T j − T k will be still unknown and needs to be found in a second reconstruction step. In order to recover the frequency differences τ ℓ and the unknown coefficients γ ℓ from the exponential sum (3.2) we employ Prony's method [24,25].…”
Section: First Step: Parameter Recovery By Prony's Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%