Lecture Notes in Computer Science
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-68234-9_66
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pronto: A Non-monotonic Probabilistic Description Logic Reasoner

Abstract: Abstract. The demonstration presents Pronto -a prototype of a nonmonotonic probabilistic reasoner for very expressive Description Logics. Pronto is built on top of the OWL DL reasoner Pellet, and is capable of performing default probabilistic reasoning in the Semantic Web. It can handle uncertainty in terminological and assertional DL axioms. The demonstration covers Pronto's features and capabilities as well as current challenges and limitations. It describes how an involved realistic problem of breast cancer… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0
1

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Terminological probabilistic knowledge is expressed using conditional constraints of the form (D|C) [l, u] that informally mean "generally, if an object belongs to C, then it belongs to D with a probability in [l, u]". PRONTO (Klinov, 2008;Klinov and Parsia, 2011) is a system that performs inference under this semantics. Similarly to (Jaeger, 1994), the terminological knowledge is interpreted statistically while the assertional knowledge is interpreted in an epistemic way by assigning degrees of beliefs to assertions.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Terminological probabilistic knowledge is expressed using conditional constraints of the form (D|C) [l, u] that informally mean "generally, if an object belongs to C, then it belongs to D with a probability in [l, u]". PRONTO (Klinov, 2008;Klinov and Parsia, 2011) is a system that performs inference under this semantics. Similarly to (Jaeger, 1994), the terminological knowledge is interpreted statistically while the assertional knowledge is interpreted in an epistemic way by assigning degrees of beliefs to assertions.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since they are all defined over ( ) 3 . P I  Proposition 5: Associative laws for union and intersection is obvious in the context of ontologies 1) ( ) ( )…”
Section: By the Definition Of The Complement (H C 3 )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fuzzy extensions of OWL have been proposed in [13] as a means of handling uncertainty in OWL ontologies. Pronto [3] is a probabilistic DL reasoner prototype. Pronto is able to represent and reason about uncertainty in OWL ontologies by establishing the probabilistic relationships between OWL classes and probabilistic relationships between an OWL class and an individual.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several probabilistic description logics have appeared in the literature [13,17]; here we just indicate a few representative proposals.…”
Section: Probabilistic Description Logics and Cralcmentioning
confidence: 99%