1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0010-0277(96)00781-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pronouncing “the” as “thee” to signal problems in speaking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

4
116
0
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 168 publications
(122 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
4
116
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Clark and Fox Tree (2002), speakers utter particular disfluencies in order to inform the listener, for example, about the length of an anticipated interruption to speech (Clark & Fox Tree, 2002;Fox Tree & Clark, 1997). In line with this view, investigations based on corpora of transcribed speech show that thee is followed by silence more often than thuh (Fox Tree & Clark, 1997) and that longer silences follow um than uh (Clark & Fox Tree, 2002), consistent with earlier speech comprehension findings that suggest that uh and um have different effects on listeners (Fox Tree, 2001).…”
supporting
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to Clark and Fox Tree (2002), speakers utter particular disfluencies in order to inform the listener, for example, about the length of an anticipated interruption to speech (Clark & Fox Tree, 2002;Fox Tree & Clark, 1997). In line with this view, investigations based on corpora of transcribed speech show that thee is followed by silence more often than thuh (Fox Tree & Clark, 1997) and that longer silences follow um than uh (Clark & Fox Tree, 2002), consistent with earlier speech comprehension findings that suggest that uh and um have different effects on listeners (Fox Tree, 2001).…”
supporting
confidence: 68%
“…In line with this view, investigations based on corpora of transcribed speech show that thee is followed by silence more often than thuh (Fox Tree & Clark, 1997) and that longer silences follow um than uh (Clark & Fox Tree, 2002), consistent with earlier speech comprehension findings that suggest that uh and um have different effects on listeners (Fox Tree, 2001). Although this view has been challenged (O'Connell & Kowal, 2005), evidence from recorded speech that is consistent with Clark and Fox Tree's findings has been reported elsewhere (e.g., Barr, 2001;Fox Tree, 2001).…”
mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Availability -or, ease of production of upcoming material -is known to aff ect sentence planning (Bock & Warren, 1985 ;Branigan et al, 2008 ;Brown-Schmidt & Konopka, 2008 ;Ferreira, 1996 ;Ferreira & Dell, 2000 ;Prat-Sala & Branigan, 2000 ). For example, when upcoming material is not available for production, speakers are more likely to lengthen preceding words (Fox Tree & Clark, 1997 ) or insert additional words (Clark & Fox Tree, 2002 ), including optional function words, such as optional that in English complement or relative clauses (Ferreira & Dell, 2000 ;Roland et al, 2006 ). Specifi cally, there is evidence that speakers are less likely to produce that if an object relative clause starts with a defi nite NP, compared to an indefi nite NP (Elsness, 1984 ;Jaeger & Wasow, 2006 ;Tottie, 1995 previous mention (Prince, 1981 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous research on the phonetics of self-repair has focused mainly on the various types of disfluency associated with the identification of a reparandum and the 'initiation' of repair, such as the lengthening of pre-repair segments (Fox Tree andClark 1997, Shriberg 2001) or the abrupt, often glottally reinforced 'cut-off' of pre-repair lexical items (Jasperson 2002, Benkenstein andSimpson 2003). This study rather focuses on the phonetic characteristics of the repair proper -in particular as compared with those of the reparandum.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%