2022
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abm2427
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pronounced sequence specificity of the TET enzyme catalytic domain guides its cellular function

Abstract: TET (ten-eleven translocation) enzymes catalyze the oxidation of 5-methylcytosine bases in DNA, thus driving active and passive DNA demethylation. Here, we report that the catalytic domain of mammalian TET enzymes favor CGs embedded within basic helix-loop-helix and basic leucine zipper domain transcription factor–binding sites, with up to 250-fold preference in vitro. Crystal structures and molecular dynamics calculations show that sequence preference is caused by intrasubstrate interactions and CG flanking s… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We hypothesised that discordant readouts could be the result of TET2, a key enzyme in EM-seq, which has reported preferences for converting specific motifs (5’-MCGW-3’) [33, 34]. From our data, TET2 did not seem to display the same motif preferences (Supplementary Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We hypothesised that discordant readouts could be the result of TET2, a key enzyme in EM-seq, which has reported preferences for converting specific motifs (5’-MCGW-3’) [33, 34]. From our data, TET2 did not seem to display the same motif preferences (Supplementary Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Echoing our motif-related observations, two recent studies have experimentally characterised the preference bias of TET enzymes for specific motifs surrounding methylated CpG dinucleotides [33, 34]. Specifically, TET2 (used in EM-seq) has a binding preference for the 4-mer motif 5’-MCGW-3’, where M=A/C and W=A/T.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Interestingly, both VMPs within enhancers and promoters display enrichment of motifs for JUN, HIF1A and FOS. TET enzymes which are involved in active demethylation, display sequence preferences for these motifs, which indicates a potential mechanistic link between the enrichment of these TFs at VMPs and changes in DNA methylation (38).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The evidence generated in this regard during the grant period is too extensive to even mention all of the high-level publications. Among other things, there was remarkable mechanistic progress in the field of DNA methylation, as well as its oxidative removal, with synthetic work on target structures providing particularly important foundations, on the basis of which important mechanistic insights were gained, e.g., into the formation and metabolization of hm 5 dC (5-hydroxymethyl-2′-deoxycytidine), f 5 dC (5-formyl-2′-deoxycytidine), and ca 5 dC (5-carboxy-2′-deoxycytidine). Activities of DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs) and ten–eleven translocation enzymes (TETs) were shown to strongly depend on flanking sequences and the in vitro observed specificity imprints were clearly detected in cellular DNA modification patterns. Insights from molecular recognition have also been used for targeted manipulation of DNA, again specifically related to the above-mentioned cytidine derivatives. , …”
Section: Results: the Three Guiding Questions: Where How And Why?mentioning
confidence: 99%