2005
DOI: 10.5334/jpl.161
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pronominal Clitics in European and Brazilian Portuguese

Abstract: This paper addresses two issues, the categorial nature of (pronominal)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
5
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…One explanation that has been proposed in the literature is that a filled C 0 requirement gives rise to enclisis (as in Cypriot Greek), while proclisis arises from the absence of this requirement, as happens in Standard Greek (Agouraki, 2001). Clitic placement has thus been explicitly argued to be the outcome of the interplay between the Proclisis Parameter and verb movement (Duarte et al, 2005). This enables us to make the connection between our results and (parametric) theories of UG.…”
Section: Implications For Universal Grammarmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One explanation that has been proposed in the literature is that a filled C 0 requirement gives rise to enclisis (as in Cypriot Greek), while proclisis arises from the absence of this requirement, as happens in Standard Greek (Agouraki, 2001). Clitic placement has thus been explicitly argued to be the outcome of the interplay between the Proclisis Parameter and verb movement (Duarte et al, 2005). This enables us to make the connection between our results and (parametric) theories of UG.…”
Section: Implications For Universal Grammarmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…My opinion is that, although making the right predictions, this hypothesis has to be further explored, especially in what concerns the contrasts in clitic placement between BP and EP. One alternative hypothesis is formulated and confirmed in Duarte, Matos & Gonçalves (2005). The authors claim that microvariation in clitic placement can be accounted for if we assume the interplay of: (i) verb movement; (ii) the Proclisis Parameter and (iii) the properties of the nodes T and Asp, namely their ability to attract V and/or to check uninterpretable features.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…According to Duarte et al (2005), differences between languages in what concerns clitic placement are determined by a Proclisis Parameter: ''The ϕ-features of pronominal clitics block Agree and Attract operations of the probe complete T: yes/no.'' This accounts for differences between languages such as BP, French, Spanish and Standard Italian, which set the value 'yes' for this parameter, on the one hand, and languages like EP, Berber and Cypriot Greek, on the other hand.…”
Section: Patterns Of Clitic Placementmentioning
confidence: 99%