Background/Aim: Evidence suggests a beneficial effect of prone positioning (PP) in and aggregate data (PubMed/EMBASE) regarding the impact of PP on the ratio of arterial partial pressure of oxygen to fraction of inspired oxygen (PO 2 /FiO 2 ) in patients with COVID-19. Results: Among 121 patients (mean age±SD 59.1±10.7 years, 55% males, 57% intubated) the mean postversus pre-PP PO 2 /FiO 2 difference was: (i) 50. 4±64.3 mmHg, p<0.01, (ii) similar in awake (58.7±72.1 mmHg) versus intubated patients (44.1±57.5 mmHg, p=NS), (iii) inversely correlated with body mass index (r=-0.43, p<0.01). Metaanalysis of 23 studies (n=547, weighted age 58.3±4.1, 73% males, 59% intubated) showed a pooled PO 2 /FiO 2 difference of 61.8 [95% confidence intervals=49.9-73.6] mmHg. Metaregression analysis revealed no associations with baseline demographics, the time in PP before assessment, and the risk of bias of the studies. Conclusion: PP seems to improve oxygenation of patients with COVID-19.Prone positioning has been shown to improve oxygenation in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) through effects on the mechanics and physiology of gas exchange (1-3). The available evidence suggests a survival benefit in selected patients mainly with early application of prolonged prone-positioning sessions (2, 3).Severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) can lead to ARDS, which is characterized by high mortality (4). Preliminary evidence suggests that prone positioning might benefit oxygenation of awake patients with severe COVID-19 (5, 6). However, the effect of prone positioning in COVID-19related ARDS is still unclear. This study aimed to characterize the effect of prone positioning on oxygenation in patients with COVID-19 and ARDS, including patients in the awake status, as well as mechanically ventilated, by meta-analyzing individual and aggregate data.
Materials and MethodsAnalysis of raw data. Seven groups of investigators (PROne Positioning in COvid-19 Research Consortium-7) provided raw data regarding the effect of prone positioning on the ratio of arterial partial pressure of oxygen to fraction of inspired oxygen (PO 2 /FiO 2 ) values in hospitalized patients with . The summary characteristics and methodology of these studies are shown in Table I. Four studies included awake patients with 8,11,12). In case of multiple sessions of prone positioning per patient and respective comparisons of PO 2 /FiO 2 values, the average PO 2 /FiO 2 difference per patient was used in the main analysis. All studies were approved by Scientific and Ethics Committees with details included in the respective publications (7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12). The current study was approved by the