2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2021.09.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prone positioning for non-intubated spontaneously breathing patients with acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

5
51
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
5
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sustaining the awake-prone position for an extended period may correlate with improvements in oxygenation levels, whereas the benefits of very short sessions may be questionable. The latest meta-analysis illustrated that prone positioning can improve the oxygenation level amongst non-intubated patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure when applied for at least 4 h daily (48). Most studies (Supplementary Table 1) applied the protocol of proning for either ≥3 h twice daily, 10-12 h, or more than 16 h (29, 31-35, 37, 39, 49-52).…”
Section: Protocols Of Awake-prone Positioningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sustaining the awake-prone position for an extended period may correlate with improvements in oxygenation levels, whereas the benefits of very short sessions may be questionable. The latest meta-analysis illustrated that prone positioning can improve the oxygenation level amongst non-intubated patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure when applied for at least 4 h daily (48). Most studies (Supplementary Table 1) applied the protocol of proning for either ≥3 h twice daily, 10-12 h, or more than 16 h (29, 31-35, 37, 39, 49-52).…”
Section: Protocols Of Awake-prone Positioningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 11 However, before this publication, six randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with a smaller sample size than the meta-trial, 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 and two completed but unpublished multi-centre RCTs that enrolled 248 patients 18 and 293 patients, 19 respectively, did not find that awake prone positioning reduced the intubation need for patients with COVID-19; and, three RCTs 12 , 13 , 18 found that patients' adherence to awake prone positioning was low. In the two most recent meta-analyses that included RCTs, 20 , 21 Fazzini and colleagues included two RCTs 11 , 14 and 12 observational studies, and they reported uncertainty regarding the effects of awake prone positioning on intubation and survival, 20 whereas Beran and colleagues included five RCTs 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 16 and nine observational studies, and they reported that awake prone positioning has a benefit on mortality. 21 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, the prone position has been proved to improve oxygenation in mechanically ventilated patients with ARDS, 8 but it must be applied for prolonged periods of time (at least 16 h) to improve the P a O 2 /FiO 2 ratio in severely hypoxaemic patients. 9 This review shows a significant improvement of the P a O 2 /FiO 2 ratio of –3.5 when patients received awake prone ventilation. A subgroup analysis showed significant improvement when patients maintained the prone position for more than 4 h, although they could not conclude if the duration of pronation was cumulative or consecutive.…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%