2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-66610-5_28
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prompting to Support Reflection: A Workplace Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, learners who value privacy in personal reflections or those who lack communication competencies may have difficulties with the face-toface mode. Blunk and Prilla (2017) pointed out how learners nowadays 'have no practice in systematically reflecting together' (p. 367). In current literature, face-to-face conversation tends to be treated as a part of collaborative reflection, which includes different types of collaboration between learners (Epler et al, 2013;McKenna et al, 2009).…”
Section: Reflective Approaches In Higher Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, learners who value privacy in personal reflections or those who lack communication competencies may have difficulties with the face-toface mode. Blunk and Prilla (2017) pointed out how learners nowadays 'have no practice in systematically reflecting together' (p. 367). In current literature, face-to-face conversation tends to be treated as a part of collaborative reflection, which includes different types of collaboration between learners (Epler et al, 2013;McKenna et al, 2009).…”
Section: Reflective Approaches In Higher Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One way of providing this support could be in prompting users to articulate corresponding contributions. Our initial work on prompts for reflection supports this (Blunk and Prilla 2017a;Renner et al 2016), but further work is needed to build and evaluate this support.…”
Section: Designing For (Collaborative) Reflection: Implications For Fmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…However, other work provides cause for doubts regarding whether collaborative reflection processes can be described by the these models (Cressey et al 2006;de Groot et al 2013), and calls reflection 'messy' (Cressey et al 2006, p. 23) rather than structured (as in the models). While it seems reasonable to doubt that collaborative reflection follows singular paths depicted in models, work available on the facilitation (Blunk and Prilla 2017a;Daudelin 1996;Fessl et al 2017;Hoyrup 2004) show that certain aspects, phases and utterances are important for collaborative reflection and can be supported. Despite this, there is no work available that attempts to identify these phases beyond theoretic models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%