1996
DOI: 10.1016/0370-2693(96)00656-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prompt production in hadronic Z0 decays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The positive observation of prompt J mesons is in accord with the findings of a similar study of prompt J production performed recently [37]. In addition, the measured value of Br(Z → J prompt + X) is in good agreement with recent theoretical calculations of prompt J production in Z decays, which include both colour singlet and colour octet contributions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The positive observation of prompt J mesons is in accord with the findings of a similar study of prompt J production performed recently [37]. In addition, the measured value of Br(Z → J prompt + X) is in good agreement with recent theoretical calculations of prompt J production in Z decays, which include both colour singlet and colour octet contributions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…• For ∆ ++ baryons, there are only two measurements in HEPDATA [46,47], which are mutually discrepant by about 2σ. The DELPHI measurement is nominally the most precise, but OPAL gives a much more serious discussion of systematic uncertainties.…”
Section: Identified Particlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Independence on the cut-off parameters has been scrutinized, as is shown in figure 3. 6 As a crosscheck, by taking the same input parameters, we have reproduced the NLO results of σ(e + e − → cc[ 1 S [8] 0 , 3 P [8] J ]+g) in reference [50]. In addition, we have calculated the QCD corrections to Z → cc[ 3 S [1] 1 ] + γ, whose one-loop and counterterm diagrams resemble that of Z → bb[ 3 S [8] 1 ] + g, obtaining exactly the same K factor given by reference [51].…”
Section: Real Correctionsmentioning
confidence: 99%