“…Cycle I ended with the dehydrohalogenation of the complex D to form A again. At the same time, cycle II processed the similar procedures (A–B 2 –C 2 –D–A) to cycle I only using the iodocyclohexane, a product from the addition of HI and the reactant CE, which named “alkyl halide” mechanism. , Meanwhile, cycle III going through CE insertion of complex D, CO insertion of complex [Rh(CO)CyI 4 ] 2– (B 2 ), and H 2 O hydrolysis of complex [(CO)Rh(COCy)I 4 ] 2– (C 2 ) to regenerate the active species D and produce the desired product cyclohexanecarboxylic acid is called the “HX-addition” mechanism (D–B 2 –C 2 –D). , In contrast, a new Rh mononuclear complex species was formed when CO–H 2 S was involved, which was proved by the EXAFS analysis of the spent Rh 1 /PIPs with H 2 S. The trace (di)methyl sulfide species were detected and confirmed by GC–MS (Figure S15), which were easily produced by the reaction between H 2 S and CH 3 I. − As demonstrated in Scheme b, we could conclude that the alkyl sulfide coordination complex [(CH 3 ) 2 SRh(CO)I 3 ] 2– (A S ) was formed and participated in a similar mechanism in Scheme a. Meanwhile, the alkyl sulfide species was deemed to an electron-donating ligand, which could accelerate cycles I and II to form the active species Rh–H complex to speed up cycle III, verified later by the DFT calculation analysis. ,, It is worth noting that cycle I was just an induction process for the formation of Rh–H-active species.…”