Promotion of a healthy lifestyle among 5-year-old overweight children: health behavior outcomes of the 'Be active, eat right’ study

Abstract

BackgroundThis study evaluates the effects of an intervention performed by youth health care professionals on child health behaviors. The intervention consisted of offering healthy lifestyle counseling to parents of overweight (not obese) 5-year-old children. Effects of the intervention on the child having breakfast, drinking sweet beverages, watching television and playing outside were evaluated.MethodsData were collected with the 'Be active, eat right’ study, a cluster randomized controlled trial among nine youth health care centers in the Netherlands. Parents of overweight children received lifestyle counseling according to the intervention protocol in the intervention condition (n = 349) and usual care in the control condition (n = 288). Parents completed questionnaires regarding demographic characteristics, health behaviors and the home environment at baseline and at 2-year follow-up. Cluster adjusted regression models were applied; interaction terms were explored.ResultsThe population for analysis consisted of 38.1% boys; mean age 5.8 [sd 0.4] years; mean BMI SDS 1.9 [sd 0.4]. There were no significant differences in the number of minutes of outside play or television viewing a day between children in the intervention and the control condition. Also, the odds ratio for having breakfast daily or drinking two or less glasses of sweet beverages a day showed no significant differences between the two conditions. Additional analyses showed that the odds ratio for drinking less than two glasses of sweet beverages at follow-up compared with baseline was significantly higher for children in both the intervention (p < 0.001) and the control condition (p = 0.029).ConclusionsComparison of the children in the two conditions showed that the intervention does not contribute to a change in health behaviors. Further studies are needed to investigate opportunities to adjust the intervention protocol, such as integration of elements in the regular well-child visit. The intervention protocol for youth health care may become part of a broader approach to tackle childhood overweight and obesity.Trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN04965410

Healthy living practices in families and child health in Taiwan

“…These elements, which are considered standard health practices, are highly associated with the health of children (Gorin et al 2014;van Grieken et al 2014) and are consistent with approaches for enhancing health and preventing disease (People 2011). In addition, the CHLPF Index provides integrated information on health behaviors attributable to children's health and reveals the supportiveness and healthiness of a family environment.…”

“…Family is a primary influence on child health and development and, consequently, the most important setting where children learn and develop health routines, habits, attitudes, and social behaviors (UNICEF 2007;Wen 2008;Turney et al 2013). Parents are responsible for establishing healthy habits and decisions related to their children's healthy living styles, creating a supportive environment, educating their children about health, and engaging their children in their own health and well-being (Christensen 2004).…”

“…The pursuit of healthy living has been associated with the ''logic of choice'' (Mol 2008), which refers to a mode of organizing perspectives and actions and of understanding the relationship between individuals, environments, and daily lives, as well as dealing with knowledge and practices of being healthy. Empirical studies have shown that healthrelated habits and perceptions attained through healthy living in a family enable children to develop everyday healthy practices that significantly affect their health outcomes (Song et al 2013;Turney et al 2013;van Grieken et al 2014) and quality of life (Dwyer et al 2009). …”

How to reduce parental provision of unhealthy foods to 3‐ to 8‐year‐old children in the home environment? A systematic review utilizing the Behaviour Change Wheel framework

“… †Effect size for end of intervention result; 0.2 small effect size, 0.5 medium effect size and 0.8 large effect size . Unable to calculate for Davoli, Lin, Nyberg and van Grieken.…”

“…Interventions with a primarily group approach, psychological capability and reflective motivation were targeted together (except for one study ), all included education intervention function and generally utilized enablement, with or without training, all using the policy category service provision. Individual‐focused interventions targeted reflective motivation alone or in combination with psychological capability and utilized either education or enablement intervention functions alone , or together . These studies used service provision, and one study using communication and marketing policy category.…”