2018
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3269645
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Promotion Incentives, GDP Manipulation and Economic Growth in China: How Does Sub-National Officials Behave When They Have Performance Pressure?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One source of conflict is in the pursuit of economic development vis-à-vis nature conservation. For local governors, economic growth has long been the top priority since it offers the highest returns in their promotion decisions (Zhou and Zeng, 2018; Li et al ., 2019; Wang and Lei, 2021). Strictly enforcing protective regulations on nature reserves also means restricting economic activities such as farming and animal husbandry, real estate development and construction, mining, and forest logging (Ren et al ., 2015; Meara, 2021).…”
Section: Key Features Of China's Nature Reserve Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One source of conflict is in the pursuit of economic development vis-à-vis nature conservation. For local governors, economic growth has long been the top priority since it offers the highest returns in their promotion decisions (Zhou and Zeng, 2018; Li et al ., 2019; Wang and Lei, 2021). Strictly enforcing protective regulations on nature reserves also means restricting economic activities such as farming and animal husbandry, real estate development and construction, mining, and forest logging (Ren et al ., 2015; Meara, 2021).…”
Section: Key Features Of China's Nature Reserve Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2012), but in authoritarian regimes, information distortions tend to be especially severe due to the lack of free media or public accountability as alternative sources of information. The research on bureaucratic information manipulation in autocracies so far has focused primarily on the case of China (Fisman and Wang 2017;Merli and Raftery 2000;Wallace 2016;Zhou and Zeng 2018), where governmental incentives for local bureaucrats not only played an essential role in ensuring the high economic performance of the regime (Xu 2011), but also made data manipulation very attractive (Chen et al 2019). 8 We are interested, however, in settings where bureaucracies' objective is not to hide information from their political principals, but to manipulate the publicly available information in line with the goals of the principals, or at least what bureaucrats perceive to be the goals of the principals.…”
Section: Data Manipulation In Authoritarian Regimesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 Thus, to understand the patterns of data manipulation, we need to study this interaction and the interests of the actors involved. Previous literature has acknowledged the importance of bureaucratic incentives; yet, the primary focus has been on how bureaucracies misinform their principals and which tools authoritarian regimes establish to address this problem (see, for example, Wallace 2016;Zhou and Zeng 2018). The settings where autocrats create incentives encouraging data manipulation and their consequences for reported information have received much smaller scholarly attention (for a recent exception, see Tang, Wang and Yi 2022).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the Interim Provisions for Party and Government Leading Cadre Tenure, mayors below the age of 57 can be promoted to higher-level positions (Kou and Tsai, 2014). Zhou and Zeng (2018) also found that mayors who were below the age of 57 had stronger promotion incentives. If they cannot get promoted before this age, they are less likely to be promoted afterward and retire with relatively lower pension packages.…”
Section: Moderator Variablementioning
confidence: 99%