2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2014.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Promoting theory of mind during middle childhood: A training program

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
93
1
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
5
93
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are important as they demonstrate that it is possible to promote a genuine advanced ToM understanding in young children and that this effect was significant, controlling for SES, verbal ability, and executive functioning. In other words, the training tested in the present study was successful in supporting a nascent advanced form of mind‐reading rather than strengthening an ability already in progress as done in previous studies involving Year‐4 children (9–10 years of age; Lecce et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…These results are important as they demonstrate that it is possible to promote a genuine advanced ToM understanding in young children and that this effect was significant, controlling for SES, verbal ability, and executive functioning. In other words, the training tested in the present study was successful in supporting a nascent advanced form of mind‐reading rather than strengthening an ability already in progress as done in previous studies involving Year‐4 children (9–10 years of age; Lecce et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Support for this prediction comes from several recent studies suggesting that elementary-school children’s personal use of mental-state language is correlated with their false-belief understanding, and that training accurate use of this language improves false-belief performance (e.g., Grazzani and Ornaghi, 2012; Lecce et al, 2014; Bianco et al, 2016). Recent work in our lab suggests that this association persists into adulthood: adults who use more mental-state language when describing social images are faster at accurately predicting the behavior of an agent in an avoidance false-belief task, suggesting that these individuals more readily attend to mental-state relevant information and are faster at retrieving mental states under time pressure (Roby and Scott, 2016b; see also Lecce et al, 2015).…”
Section: Predictions From This Mentalistic Accountmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last two decades, various lines of inquiry have demonstrated that social input enriched with mental state discourse advances children's ToM development. Such inquiries include mental state discourse training in classrooms (e.g., Lecce et al, 2014), conversational environment of deaf children (e.g., Peterson and Siegal, 1995), and family characteristics including maternal sensitivity (e.g., Meins et al, 2003), content, and quality of family conversation (e.g., Jenkins et al, 2003), and sibling relationship (e.g., Hughes et al, 2010). In the case of schooling experience, Flavell (1987) claimed 30 years ago that the epistemic discourse in teaching and learning context could be a “hotbed” (p. 27) for the acquisition of false belief understanding.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%