2003
DOI: 10.2148/benv.29.2.157.54469
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Promoting the Natural Greenstructure of Towns and Cities: English Nature's Accessible Natural Greenspace Standards Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, it underwent full peer review but has not been through the copyediting, typesetting, pagination and proofreading process, which may lead to differences between this version and the published version: Baró, F., Haase, D., Gómez-Baggethun, E., Frantzeskaki recommends that urban population should have an accessible green space no more than 300 m from 623 home (Barbosa et al, 2007). However, these standards have been criticized because they fail to 624 address issues such as green space quality or local context and needs (Pauleit et al, 2003). Still, some 625 authors claim that green space recreational standards are needed but they should be locally developed 626 according to specific social and quality criteria (Baycan-Levent and Nijkamp, 2009).…”
Section: Strengths and Weaknesses Of Using Eqs To Assess Es Mismatchementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it underwent full peer review but has not been through the copyediting, typesetting, pagination and proofreading process, which may lead to differences between this version and the published version: Baró, F., Haase, D., Gómez-Baggethun, E., Frantzeskaki recommends that urban population should have an accessible green space no more than 300 m from 623 home (Barbosa et al, 2007). However, these standards have been criticized because they fail to 624 address issues such as green space quality or local context and needs (Pauleit et al, 2003). Still, some 625 authors claim that green space recreational standards are needed but they should be locally developed 626 according to specific social and quality criteria (Baycan-Levent and Nijkamp, 2009).…”
Section: Strengths and Weaknesses Of Using Eqs To Assess Es Mismatchementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Herzele and Wiedemann (2003) developed an integrated indicator to assess the accessibility and attractiveness of urban greenspace in four Flemish cities. Pauleit et al (2003) proposed a more flexible approach named Accessible Natural Greenspace Standards Model to promote the natural greenstructure of towns and cities and devised a decision-support framework for its implementation. Li and Wang (2003) proposed a method for the evaluation, planning and prediction of ecosystem services of urban greenspace, applying landscape ecological principles, taking Yangzhou City in China as the case.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many urban areas the creation of new public green spaces has not kept pace with the growth of the built-up areas (Pauleit 2003). In addition, the information on the provision and quality of urban green space is rather limited, while policy and planning on urban green is rather fragmented in most cities (Pauleit 2003;Pauleit et al 2003;Scottish Executive 2001;Szulczewska and Kaliszuk 2003). In many cases, we do observe lack of project rationalization for green spaces, weak management and implementation structures and limited funding possibilities (De Sousa 2003;DTLR 2001;Pauleit 2003;Scottish Executive 2001;Tyrväinen and Väänänen 1998).…”
Section: Issues In Urban Green Space Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%