“…Dual language education is still heavily focused on bilingualism and biliteracy, with a superficial treatment of biculturalism (Cervantes-Soon et al, 2017; Feinauer & Howard, 2014; Freire & Valdez, 2017). To address this gap, biculturalism needs to be addressed from a social justice perspective (Freire, 2020), and scholars have proposed that sociopolitical consciousness be incorporated as one of the goals of dual language education (Cervantes-Soon et al, 2017; Freire, 2014, 2016, 2020), an addition which has the potential to provide valuable social justice support.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Educators need to take the first step in reading the world, and not just the word, if they want to facilitate their students’ ability to engage in this sociopolitical process (Freire, 1970). An increasing number of scholars have urged educators to develop their sociopolitical consciousness in the field of dual language education (Alfaro et al, 2014; Cervantes-Soon et al, 2017; Freire, 2016, 2020), despite how challenging some educators may find this (Freire & Valdez, 2017). Unless privileged individuals develop consciousness, they will be unaware of how privilege has benefited them in areas such as race, class, language, and ability throughout their lives and thus many will justify hegemonic language practices and promotes oppressive everyday interactions in society such as microaggressions.…”
Section: Conceptual Framework and Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As most educators are privileged according to their race, class, and language, many are unprepared to work with minoritized students, due to limited knowledge about their students’ communities and minimal experience with the social inequities these students face. They have yet to develop a sociopolitical consciousness that enables them to embrace social justice beliefs and practices (Freire, 1970; Freire, 2020; García & Guerra, 2004). Some white teachers are in the process of developing sociopolitical consciousness, and others have already engaged in critical work “based on their solidarity and commitment to social justice and equality” (Darder, 2012, p. 125).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The three goals of dual language education are academic achievement, bilingualism/biliteracy, and biculturalism. Increasing literature in the field of dual language education urges the need to develop sociopolitical consciousness for these teachers and awareness of the need to focus on social justice work (Alfaro & Bartolomé, 2017; Cervantes-Soon, 2014; Cervantes-Soon et al, 2017; Freire, 2014, 2016, 2020; Palmer, 2009).…”
Literature is limited demonstrating how some in-service teachers have developed sociopolitical consciousness and why they commit to social justice. Drawing on interviews, email correspondence, and Facebook postings collected throughout a school year, this article shows the life experiences of one white dual language educator who developed sociopolitical consciousness and a commitment to social justice as a result of what I refer to as conscientization calls based on personal experiences and observed inequities affecting minoritized populations in U.S. and Latin American contexts. This article makes a call to promote educational equity by helping privileged pre-service and in-service teachers by using, as pedagogical tools, conscientization calls they might have received throughout their lives.
“…Dual language education is still heavily focused on bilingualism and biliteracy, with a superficial treatment of biculturalism (Cervantes-Soon et al, 2017; Feinauer & Howard, 2014; Freire & Valdez, 2017). To address this gap, biculturalism needs to be addressed from a social justice perspective (Freire, 2020), and scholars have proposed that sociopolitical consciousness be incorporated as one of the goals of dual language education (Cervantes-Soon et al, 2017; Freire, 2014, 2016, 2020), an addition which has the potential to provide valuable social justice support.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Educators need to take the first step in reading the world, and not just the word, if they want to facilitate their students’ ability to engage in this sociopolitical process (Freire, 1970). An increasing number of scholars have urged educators to develop their sociopolitical consciousness in the field of dual language education (Alfaro et al, 2014; Cervantes-Soon et al, 2017; Freire, 2016, 2020), despite how challenging some educators may find this (Freire & Valdez, 2017). Unless privileged individuals develop consciousness, they will be unaware of how privilege has benefited them in areas such as race, class, language, and ability throughout their lives and thus many will justify hegemonic language practices and promotes oppressive everyday interactions in society such as microaggressions.…”
Section: Conceptual Framework and Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As most educators are privileged according to their race, class, and language, many are unprepared to work with minoritized students, due to limited knowledge about their students’ communities and minimal experience with the social inequities these students face. They have yet to develop a sociopolitical consciousness that enables them to embrace social justice beliefs and practices (Freire, 1970; Freire, 2020; García & Guerra, 2004). Some white teachers are in the process of developing sociopolitical consciousness, and others have already engaged in critical work “based on their solidarity and commitment to social justice and equality” (Darder, 2012, p. 125).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The three goals of dual language education are academic achievement, bilingualism/biliteracy, and biculturalism. Increasing literature in the field of dual language education urges the need to develop sociopolitical consciousness for these teachers and awareness of the need to focus on social justice work (Alfaro & Bartolomé, 2017; Cervantes-Soon, 2014; Cervantes-Soon et al, 2017; Freire, 2014, 2016, 2020; Palmer, 2009).…”
Literature is limited demonstrating how some in-service teachers have developed sociopolitical consciousness and why they commit to social justice. Drawing on interviews, email correspondence, and Facebook postings collected throughout a school year, this article shows the life experiences of one white dual language educator who developed sociopolitical consciousness and a commitment to social justice as a result of what I refer to as conscientization calls based on personal experiences and observed inequities affecting minoritized populations in U.S. and Latin American contexts. This article makes a call to promote educational equity by helping privileged pre-service and in-service teachers by using, as pedagogical tools, conscientization calls they might have received throughout their lives.
“…Indeed, Cervantes‐Soon, Palmer, Heiman, Dorner, and other scholars have called for the necessity of critical consciousness in DL education: the ability to “reflectively discern the differences in power and privilege rooted in social relationships that structure inequalities and shape the material conditions of our lives” as well as to “recogniz[e] one’s role in these dynamics” (Cervantes‐Soon et al, 2017, p. 3; see also Palmer et al, 2019). They and others have argued that critical consciousness and sociopolitical consciousness must be developed when future DL educators are in their teacher training programs (Cervantes‐Soon et al, 2017; J. Freire, 2020; Rodríguez‐Mojica, Briceño, & Muñoz‐Muñoz, 2019). Similarly, Flores and Chaparro (2018) suggested that DL teacher training should integrate a materialist antiracist approach to form DL educators into language activists who are informed and consequently challenge the sociopolitical factors (e.g., poverty, racism) that continue to marginalize and oppress language‐minoritized students.…”
Section: Principals’ Development Of Critical Consciousnessmentioning
This study explores how principals of dual language (DL) programs draw on two dominant societal discourses around language education—linguistic instrumentalism/neoliberalism and equity/social justice—to make sense of their programs. Through in‐depth interviews with 19 principals of Spanish‐English elementary school DL programs in Arizona and California, the researchers examine (1) the ways in which the two discourses manifested in the principals’ talk, and 2) the consequences for English learners of each discursive framing. The researchers found that framing a program within each discourse led principals to different conclusions about the purpose of DL, its goals, and who should be included in it. Principals adopting a predominantly neoliberal frame understood DL as a way to gain a competitive edge, both for their schools (competing with other schools for students) and for their students (competing for future jobs at a global scale). Principals drawing primarily on social justice discourse instead understood DL as a historically contingent, collaborative movement for social transformation. The authors illustrate how the first framing can contribute to the exclusion of English learners from DL, while the latter presupposes their belonging. They also discuss future work exploring how principals come to develop their discursive framings.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.