2021
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.1c10805
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Promoting Selective Generation of Formic Acid from CO2 Using Mn(bpy)(CO)3Br as Electrocatalyst and Triethylamine/Isopropanol as Additives

Abstract: Urgent solutions are needed to efficiently convert the greenhouse gas CO2 into higher-value products. In this work, fac-Mn­(bpy)­(CO)3Br (bpy = 2,2′-bipyridine) is employed as electrocatalyst in reductive CO2 conversion. It is shown that product selectivity can be shifted from CO toward HCOOH using appropriate additives, i.e., Et3N along with iPrOH. A crucial aspect of the strategy is to outrun the dimer-generating parent-child reaction involving fac-Mn­(bpy)­(CO)3Br and [Mn­(bpy)­(CO)3]− and instead produce t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

5
32
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
5
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, acquiring an advanced understanding of proton-coupled electron transfer in the CO 2 reduction catalytic cycle will allow us to manipulate reactive intermediates under nonequilibrium conditions to promote a desired outcome and develop new processes and materials to secure a clean energy future. Although CO 2 is a strong electrophile, its conversion via nucleophilic attack is often inhibited by a lack of thermodynamic driving force due to the often large reorganization and activation energies required. The utilization of proton-coupled electron transfer reduces the thermodynamic energy requirement for the reduction of CO 2 significantly (eqs and ) relative to the highly endergonic one-electron reduction to the CO 2 •– radical anion described by eq . Of course, taking advantage of proton-coupled reduction in the conversion of CO 2 raises the additional challenge of catalyst selectivity due to competitive metal–hydride formation which can lead to hydrogen gas and/or formate production. Mn electrocatalysts have risen as promising alternatives to heavy metal catalysts due to their ability to catalyze CO 2 reduction at low overpotentials while maintaining a high selectivity for CO evolution or even selective formate production in some cases. Previously, we were able to demonstrate a high selectivity for CO production at the low overpotential protonation-first pathway with the electrochemically activated [ fac -Mn I {[(MeO) 2 Ph] 2 bpy}­(CO) 3 (CH 3 CN)]­(OTf) precatalyst, saving 0.55 V in overpotential relative to the more commonly observed reduction-first pathway . The mechanistic differences between the protonation-first and the reduction-first pathways are illustrated in Scheme .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, acquiring an advanced understanding of proton-coupled electron transfer in the CO 2 reduction catalytic cycle will allow us to manipulate reactive intermediates under nonequilibrium conditions to promote a desired outcome and develop new processes and materials to secure a clean energy future. Although CO 2 is a strong electrophile, its conversion via nucleophilic attack is often inhibited by a lack of thermodynamic driving force due to the often large reorganization and activation energies required. The utilization of proton-coupled electron transfer reduces the thermodynamic energy requirement for the reduction of CO 2 significantly (eqs and ) relative to the highly endergonic one-electron reduction to the CO 2 •– radical anion described by eq . Of course, taking advantage of proton-coupled reduction in the conversion of CO 2 raises the additional challenge of catalyst selectivity due to competitive metal–hydride formation which can lead to hydrogen gas and/or formate production. Mn electrocatalysts have risen as promising alternatives to heavy metal catalysts due to their ability to catalyze CO 2 reduction at low overpotentials while maintaining a high selectivity for CO evolution or even selective formate production in some cases. Previously, we were able to demonstrate a high selectivity for CO production at the low overpotential protonation-first pathway with the electrochemically activated [ fac -Mn I {[(MeO) 2 Ph] 2 bpy}­(CO) 3 (CH 3 CN)]­(OTf) precatalyst, saving 0.55 V in overpotential relative to the more commonly observed reduction-first pathway . The mechanistic differences between the protonation-first and the reduction-first pathways are illustrated in Scheme .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This yields the Rh­(III)-hydride species 4a , which lies slightly above 3 in terms of free energy. The formation of metal hydrides assisted by amines has not only been proposed before for the RhCp* catalyst in homogeneous conditions but also for other catalysts in the context of CO 2 RR. Also of note, this process is faster than the putative coordination of CO 2 to 3 , which involves a higher, overall free-energy barrier of 14.8 kcal mol –1 , in line with the product selectivity toward formate. As shown in Figure b, the experimental evolution of the product concentration over time follows a logarithmic growth, reaching a plateau after ca.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Amine moieties were proposed not only to provide binding sites, hence a reservoir of CO 2 under the form of carbamates, but also to stabilize and promote the formation of the hydride catalytic intermediate ( HMn ), thereby favoring formate production instead of CO [19c,20] . Contemporarily to our current work a third paper from Daasbjerg group [21] appeared, regarding the use of amines with Mn catalysts, but in homogeneous solutions, different solvent, and different amine concentrations, which represent a nice complement to our heterogeneous approach. These amines, which are supposed to work as proton shuttle, were either introduced in large excess with respect the catalyst [19a] or upon an elaborated synthetic procedure as a side‐arm of the Mn catalyst (Figure 1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%