1999
DOI: 10.1093/clinchem/45.5.732
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Promoting Safe and Effective Genetic Tests in the United States: Work of the Task Force on Genetic Testing

Abstract: The Task Force on Genetic Testing was created to review genetic testing in the United States and, when necessary, to make recommendations to ensure the development of safe and effective genetic tests. A survey to explore the state of genetic testing was undertaken for the Task Force and completed in early 1995. The survey, as well as literature reports and other information collected for the Task Force, showed problems affecting safety and effectiveness, as defined by the Task Force: validity and utility of pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
88
0
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
88
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the U.S. Task Force on Genetic Testing, clinical utility and practice guidelines for genetic tests requires a systematic assessment of their usefulness and potential health-related application (Holtzman, 1997). Grosse et al assert that a screening or diagnostic test alone does not have inherit utility; because it is the adoption of therapeutic or preventive interventions that influence health outcomes, the clinical utility of a test depends on effective access to appropriate interventions (Grosse, 2006).…”
Section: Issues Of Genetic Counseling and Testing In Ibdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the U.S. Task Force on Genetic Testing, clinical utility and practice guidelines for genetic tests requires a systematic assessment of their usefulness and potential health-related application (Holtzman, 1997). Grosse et al assert that a screening or diagnostic test alone does not have inherit utility; because it is the adoption of therapeutic or preventive interventions that influence health outcomes, the clinical utility of a test depends on effective access to appropriate interventions (Grosse, 2006).…”
Section: Issues Of Genetic Counseling and Testing In Ibdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The National Human Genome Research Institute's Task Force on Genetic Testing 1997 report, "Promoting Safe and Effective Genetic Testing in the United States," recommended that children not be tested for adult-onset genetic conditions unless medical interventions existed that could benefit the children directly. 122 Similarly, a 2001 policy statement by the American Academy of Pediatrics stated that "genetic testing of children and adolescents to predict late-onset disorders is inappropriate when the genetic information has not been shown to reduce morbidity and mortality through interventions initiated in childhood." 123 While the distinction between early-and late-onset diseases may be useful in evaluating genetic testing of children for many conditions, obesity is not so easily categorized.…”
Section: Distinction Between Early and Late Onset Is Frequently Made mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tests conducted purely for research are excluded from the definition, as are tests for somatic (as opposed to heritable) mutations and testing for forensic purposes. 19 risk prior to the onset of a variety of clinical diseases. It is anticipated that the presymptomatic identification of at-risk individuals will permit the implementation of preventative intervention strategies, potentially enabling avoidance of disease entirely.…”
Section: Glossary Of Genetic Termsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While this may be considered "genetic testing," the clinical validity and utility such a test provides, particularly for the clinical care of an individual, must be demonstrated. 19,20 The utility of genetic information to predict disease risk is predicated on the identification of genetic polymorphisms that are, in fact, associated with disease risk in a meaningful way. In contrast to the direct relationship between genetic mutations and the occurrence of symptoms in simple genetic diseases, the relationship between genetic polymorphisms and the occurrence of symptoms in complex diseases is much more difficult to validate.…”
Section: Figure 1 General Paradigm For Genetic Medicinementioning
confidence: 99%