“…Duoethnography also offers a range of extensive discussion topics that, although not visible at first glance, may significantly affect the process of language learning and teaching. This can be especially beneficial in pre-service teacher education, as topics such as discussing leadership (Le Fevre, Farquhar, 2016), diversity (Brown, Hamilton, 2016), professionalism (Woods & Sebok, 2016), the hidden curriculum (Krammer, Mongiardi, 2012), credibility in teaching (Breault, 2016), becoming , the theatre , to name but a few titles from the existing duoethnographic projects conducted in general education, may without doubt contribute to the development of new concepts and categories in the field of language learning and teaching. For example, comparing and contrasting the hidden curriculum of their schools in the past, Krammer and Mongiardi (2012) came up with the new construct of the cryptic curriculum in the professional literature on the hidden curriculum.…”