Forms of Practitioner Reflexivity 2016
DOI: 10.1057/978-1-137-52712-7_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Promoting Professional Conversations and Reflective Practice Among Educators: Unpacking Our Portfolios Using Duoethnography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Duoethnography also offers a range of extensive discussion topics that, although not visible at first glance, may significantly affect the process of language learning and teaching. This can be especially beneficial in pre-service teacher education, as topics such as discussing leadership (Le Fevre, Farquhar, 2016), diversity (Brown, Hamilton, 2016), professionalism (Woods & Sebok, 2016), the hidden curriculum (Krammer, Mongiardi, 2012), credibility in teaching (Breault, 2016), becoming , the theatre , to name but a few titles from the existing duoethnographic projects conducted in general education, may without doubt contribute to the development of new concepts and categories in the field of language learning and teaching. For example, comparing and contrasting the hidden curriculum of their schools in the past, Krammer and Mongiardi (2012) came up with the new construct of the cryptic curriculum in the professional literature on the hidden curriculum.…”
Section: Learning From Duoethnographymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Duoethnography also offers a range of extensive discussion topics that, although not visible at first glance, may significantly affect the process of language learning and teaching. This can be especially beneficial in pre-service teacher education, as topics such as discussing leadership (Le Fevre, Farquhar, 2016), diversity (Brown, Hamilton, 2016), professionalism (Woods & Sebok, 2016), the hidden curriculum (Krammer, Mongiardi, 2012), credibility in teaching (Breault, 2016), becoming , the theatre , to name but a few titles from the existing duoethnographic projects conducted in general education, may without doubt contribute to the development of new concepts and categories in the field of language learning and teaching. For example, comparing and contrasting the hidden curriculum of their schools in the past, Krammer and Mongiardi (2012) came up with the new construct of the cryptic curriculum in the professional literature on the hidden curriculum.…”
Section: Learning From Duoethnographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, such projects encourage duoethnographers to come up with novel forms to share their stories. These could include visual material, such as in reflective practice photography (Matthews, Garrett, 2016), but also digital storytelling (Rasmor, 2016), or using duoethnography to unpack traditional student teacher portfolios (Woods, Sebok, 2016).…”
Section: Learning From Duoethnographymentioning
confidence: 99%