Abstract:Objectives. To explore perceptions related to increased utilization of group interventions as part of a service reorganization within a pediatric rehabilitation program. Methods. Individual interviews with program administrators (n=13) and focus groups with therapists (n=19) and parents of children with disabilities (n=5) were conducted. Data were analysed using a coding grid inspired by the organized action systems theory. Results. Administrators and therapists identified several issues including the need to improve the referral process for groups and the coordination across services. Groups considerably modified practice and required substantial efforts from therapists. Administrators felt groups contributed to increased service accessibility.Although therapists had some doubts about service quality in groups, especially in regards to the reduced attention to individual needs, they reported positive benefits on children's social participation. Generally, parents were satisfied with group interventions. Conclusion. Groups appear to be a promising method of service delivery, but organizational-related issues should be considered.
Key wordsRehabilitation, children, disabilities, group intervention, service delivery 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59
BACKGROUNDGroup interventions are increasingly used in clinical settings and are sometimes presented as a strategy to decrease waiting times (Bell, Corfield, Davies, & Richardson, 2010;Miller et al., 2008). Group interventions are defined as sessions where two or more clients interact to achieve common goals (Graham & Avent, 2004;Schwartzberg, Howe, & Barnes, 2008). Generally, groups are reported to enhance psychological support, to have motivational effects, to ease the pressure related to the intensity of one-to-one interactions, to provide opportunities for practice and to alleviate feelings of isolation and hopelessness experienced by persons with disabilities (Coulter, Weber, & Scarvell, 2009; Graham & Avent, 2004; Hong & Howard, 2002). For various pediatric populations, groups have been reported to be as effective as individual interventions with respect to families' satisfaction and improvements of children's skills (Davies & Gavin, 1993; Hung & Pang, 2010; Kayihan, 2001). Groups are also presumed to be more cost-effective than individual interventions (Coulter, et al., 2009; Hung & Pang, 2010; LaForme Fiss & Effgen, 2007; LaForme Fiss, et al., 2009; Trahey, 1990), although few cost-effective studies exist.The decision of whether to treat a child individually or in a group is complex. Depending on the rehabilitation goals, individual interventions, or small or large group interventions can be offered to families (Palisano & Murr, 2009). Although about 50% of occupational and physical therapists (LaForme Fiss & Effgen, 2007, Lawlor & Henderson, 1989 reported u...