Promoting learning and innovation in organizations through complexity leadership theory

Abstract

Purpose Current organizations face a complex competitive landscape driven by globalization and technology that puts them in the course of a new economic age. This complexity stresses learning and innovation as fundamental mechanisms for organizational survival. This paper aims to propose that how learning and innovation emerge and affect organizational performance can be better understood through the complexity leadership theory. Design/methodology/approach The authors review literature on complexity leadership theory, learning and innovation in complex bureaucratic environments and then present reflections regarding how learning and innovation can be achieved through the interaction of three complexity leadership functions: adaptive, administrative and enabling. This conceptual framework suggests that individuals are in constant interaction, exchange information, influence each other and collectively produce emergent properties that promote effective learning and innovation. Findings We propose that learning and innovation can be better achieved in organizations if the complexity leadership theory is applied as an alternative to centralized forms of influence and control. Originality/value This paper presents a reflection on the benefits of the complexity leadership theory as an alternative framework to understand organizational leadership. Furthermore, this paper proposes that the complexity leadership theory is more adequate to generate learning and innovation in complex, fast-changing work environments.

Employees’ job involvement and satisfaction in a learning organization: A study in India's manufacturing sector

“…They have aptly been described as platforms where individuals obtain information needed to determine results, develop new thinking patterns, and continually update the mechanism of learning (Senge, ). In recent years, research has been conducted on learning organizations and innovation (Eghtesadi & Hamidizadeh, ), and on the basic understanding that both learning and novelty are strategic factors that affect a firm's growth in a volatile environment (Mendes, Gomes, Marques‐Quinteiro, Lind, & Curral, ).…”

Decision-facilitating information in hidden-action setups: an agent-based approach

“…This is a remarkable and counterintuitive result: The results suggest that-at least for the first few periods-a significantly higher level of performance can be achieved in turbulent environments, as compared to stable environments. This finding might be explained by the pressure to be innovative, which turbulent environments impose on the principal (Mendes et al 2016). The time span in which this result can be observed is critically shaped by the sophistication of the principal's internal information sys-Fig.…”

Transformative Leadership and Contextual Change

“…For the health sector where the increasing importance of non-communicable diseases and changing political views on the welfare state have generated an interest in deinstitutionalization and socialization of care and more emphasis on the agency of clients. (Hassink [49], chapter 1) In the care domain, the demographic and epidemiologic transitions (ageing and the shift in emphasis towards chronic diseases), concerns on the long-term affordability of the current care system and sociological trends (individualization and a longing for more autonomy) all press on incumbent care practices and their institutional and discursive embedment [56]. In agriculture, liberalization of global trade, the need to deal with climate change and increasing scarcity of key resources such as phosphates, societal concerns about animal welfare are among the developments that press on the EU Common Agricultural Policy and agrifood value chains [57]-with due consequences for farmer incomes.…”

“…Grand societal challenges, such as climate change, urbanization, food security, and ageing, are generally seen in organizational studies as parts of a turbulent context to which organizations must adapt [1][2][3][4]. This obviously reflects the traditional central concern regarding how organizations ensure their fit with their environment [5,6].…”