2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmh.2022.100082
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Promoting labour migrant health equity through action on the structural determinants: A systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the interventions addressed proximal health determinants such as financial literacy and mental health self-help. This is supported by findings from a systematic review of interventions on migrant worker health, which identified limited structural-level interventions, with the majority intervening on proximal health determinants [ 212 ]. Taken together, these findings indicate a need for further research on interventions for migrant and MDW health, particularly in addressing the structural determinants of health.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Moreover, the interventions addressed proximal health determinants such as financial literacy and mental health self-help. This is supported by findings from a systematic review of interventions on migrant worker health, which identified limited structural-level interventions, with the majority intervening on proximal health determinants [ 212 ]. Taken together, these findings indicate a need for further research on interventions for migrant and MDW health, particularly in addressing the structural determinants of health.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…In the US, employment-contingent health insurance has lower premiums, and job candidates would prefer jobs with employer-sponsored health insurance benefits [12,13]. However, the employer-sponsored health insurance in the US is not transferrable [14][15][16]. On one hand, this has the effect of job lock, i.e., employees may have to continue their job, which they might prefer to leave, due to the risk of losing health insurance, lowering the labor force mobility [17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%