2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.12.074
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Promoting justified risk-based decisions in contaminated land management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The precautionary and polluter pays principles are also significant components of UK contaminated land management. The precautionary principle promotes discretion in the presence of uncertainty, seeking to protect the public from exposure to harm (Reinikainen and Sorvari, 2016), while the polluter pays principles assigns liability for clean-up on the person or persons responsible for the release of a polluting substance (Catney et al, 2006;EA, 2009a Overall, the UK's contaminated land legislation uses a risk-based, tiered approach to support decision making as outlined in CLR 11 (DEFRA, 2012;DEFRA and EA, 2004). Tier 1 requires that a potential connection be identified between a hazard and a receptor, and this is done using the source, pathway and receptor S-P-R model (EA, 2004).…”
Section: Contaminated Land Management In the Ukmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The precautionary and polluter pays principles are also significant components of UK contaminated land management. The precautionary principle promotes discretion in the presence of uncertainty, seeking to protect the public from exposure to harm (Reinikainen and Sorvari, 2016), while the polluter pays principles assigns liability for clean-up on the person or persons responsible for the release of a polluting substance (Catney et al, 2006;EA, 2009a Overall, the UK's contaminated land legislation uses a risk-based, tiered approach to support decision making as outlined in CLR 11 (DEFRA, 2012;DEFRA and EA, 2004). Tier 1 requires that a potential connection be identified between a hazard and a receptor, and this is done using the source, pathway and receptor S-P-R model (EA, 2004).…”
Section: Contaminated Land Management In the Ukmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Governments must prioritise the allocation of limited resources to clean-up contaminated sites. Decisions to prioritise sites are often risk-based, and frameworks to assess risk adopt the source-pathway-receptor (SPR) model (Luo et al, 2009;Reinikainen and Sorvari, 2016). The SPR model determines whether there is a linkage between pollutant and receptor ( Rodrigues et al, 2009b;Swartjes, 2011;Defra, 2012).…”
Section: Risk-based Decisionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The future land use could be a stable landscape, agriculture, grazing, housing or cultural and recreational (Mishra et al 2012). Any remedial efforts should be directed towards removing the risk rather than the contaminant (Reinikainen and Sorvari 2016). The traditional methods of remediation are based on excavation and subsequent disposal of the contaminated soil which is not only very expensive but does not eliminate the contaminant since it is only transferred to another site (Kuppusamy et al 2016b).…”
Section: Risk-based Remediation Of Amls-a Sustainable Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these metal concentrations represent the total metal concentrations and major portion of this metal may not be naturally bioavailable due to ageing in which bioavailability of the metal decreases over a long period of time due to physiochemical or biological processes such as weathering, sequestration etc. Therefore, risk based remediation that considers social, economic and environmental factors and directed towards eliminating or minimising risk to human and environmental health as a cost effective approach has been recently gaining more recognition for remediation of contaminated sites worldwide (Reinikainen and Sorvari 2016). This approach considers contaminant bioavailability therefore its exposure and risk to biota as central rather than total contaminant which saves the industry substantial costs from unnecessary remediation (Latawiec et al 2010).…”
Section: Risk-based Remediation Of Amls-a Sustainable Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%