Abstract:This prospective cohort study compared women participating in CenteringPregnancy® group prenatal care (N = 120) with those in standard individual care (N = 221) to determine if participation in Centering was associated with improvements in perceived social support and quality of life, with concomitant decreases in screens of postpartum depression and improvements in breastfeeding rates. Participants completed surveys at the onset of prenatal care, in the late third trimester and in the postpartum period. Cente… Show more
“…However, our findings regarding improved patient experience with Access to Care, driven by their ability to see their provider quickly ("saw provider within 15 minutes of appointment") reflects previous research citing the importance of the amount of time saved waiting for care for women in Centering (22). Similarly, the results of the qualitative analysis are consistent with previous findings reporting improvements in social support for women in Centering programs in military health settings (13,22). Our findings from interviews with providers and implementation staff also reflect those of previous research demonstrating the challenges of finding dedicated program space as well as the importance of support from MTF leadership (21).…”
This study compared TRICARE, the health care program of the United States Department of Defense Military Health System, beneficiaries in CenteringPregnancy, an enhanced prenatal care model, to women in individual prenatal care within the same military treatment facility. Maternity patient experience ratings from May 2014 to February 2016 were compiled from the TRICARE Outpatient Satisfaction Survey. Centering patients had 1.91 higher odds of being satisfied with access to care ( p < .01, 95% CI = 1.2-3.1) than women in individual care. Specifically, the saw provider within 15 minutes of appointment measure found Centering patients to have 2.00 higher odds of being satisfied than women in individual care ( p < .01, 95% CI = 1.2-3.3). There were no other statistically significant differences between cohorts. Qualitative responses indicate most Centering patients surveyed had good experiences, appreciated the structure and communication with others, and would recommend the program. Providers identified command/leadership support, dedicated space, and buy-in from all staff as important factors for successful implementation. Enhanced prenatal care models may improve access to and experiences with care. Program evaluation will be important as the military health system continues to implement such programs.
“…However, our findings regarding improved patient experience with Access to Care, driven by their ability to see their provider quickly ("saw provider within 15 minutes of appointment") reflects previous research citing the importance of the amount of time saved waiting for care for women in Centering (22). Similarly, the results of the qualitative analysis are consistent with previous findings reporting improvements in social support for women in Centering programs in military health settings (13,22). Our findings from interviews with providers and implementation staff also reflect those of previous research demonstrating the challenges of finding dedicated program space as well as the importance of support from MTF leadership (21).…”
This study compared TRICARE, the health care program of the United States Department of Defense Military Health System, beneficiaries in CenteringPregnancy, an enhanced prenatal care model, to women in individual prenatal care within the same military treatment facility. Maternity patient experience ratings from May 2014 to February 2016 were compiled from the TRICARE Outpatient Satisfaction Survey. Centering patients had 1.91 higher odds of being satisfied with access to care ( p < .01, 95% CI = 1.2-3.1) than women in individual care. Specifically, the saw provider within 15 minutes of appointment measure found Centering patients to have 2.00 higher odds of being satisfied than women in individual care ( p < .01, 95% CI = 1.2-3.3). There were no other statistically significant differences between cohorts. Qualitative responses indicate most Centering patients surveyed had good experiences, appreciated the structure and communication with others, and would recommend the program. Providers identified command/leadership support, dedicated space, and buy-in from all staff as important factors for successful implementation. Enhanced prenatal care models may improve access to and experiences with care. Program evaluation will be important as the military health system continues to implement such programs.
“…This suggested an impact of the prenatal sessions beyond the meeting rooms to family and community levels, which could engender more social support for mothers. Interestingly, Chae et al . have shown that group prenatal care confers higher perception of family and friends’ support compared to traditional prenatal care.…”
Objective
To assess women's experience of group prenatal care in a rural Nigerian community.
Methods
In an observational study, consenting pregnant women were enrolled in a group prenatal care program based on the CenteringPregnancy model from July 1, 2010, to June 30, 2011, in Tsibiri, Nigeria. Women were interviewed before joining the group and postnatally. A predesigned pro forma was used to assess group behavior during sessions. Descriptive and inferential statistics were applied to data.
Results
In total, 161 women enrolled, and 54 of 72 scheduled prenatal sessions took place. The average number of visits was three per woman, with good group interaction and cohesion. Mothers who could mention at least five out of eight danger signs of pregnancy increased from 1.4% (2) to 13.3% (14) (P<0.001, 95% CI 4.28–19.52), while mean knowledge score for danger signs increased from 31% to 47.8% (P<0.001, 95% CI 0.86–2.16). Commitment to birth preparedness plans was impressive. The mothers enjoyed the group sessions and shared the lessons they learned with others.
Conclusion
Group prenatal care was feasible and acceptable to women in the present study setting. Comparative trials would be helpful to demonstrate the benefits of the tested model in low‐income settings.
“… 1 Social support is linked to improvements in maternal quality of life, higher rates of continued breastfeeding, and breastfeeding self-efficacy. 2–4 Adequate social support promotes mental health in the perinatal period by reducing low mood and anxiety and helping women manage feelings of isolation and disempowerment. 1 As women transition to motherhood, social support also enhances maternal competence by providing encouragement, promoting self-esteem, and decreasing stress.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an alternative to traditional models of prenatal care, group prenatal care (GPNC), where women receive care in small groups and participate in group discussion covering a variety of health topics related to pregnancy, has been shown to boost women's perceptions of social support. 2 , 14 CenteringPregnancy, an evidence-based GPNC model, provides prenatal care through a supportive group process. 15 Health care providers facilitate discussion and engage in interactive learning activities with group members ( i.e.…”
Objective:
This study aimed to identify the influence of the four constructs of social support on positive pregnancy experiences in CenteringPregnancy, a group prenatal care (GPNC) model.
Methods:
Using a qualitative descriptive design, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 11 women who had participated in at least 6 of 10 GPNC sessions at a family practice medicine residency. Participants were asked to describe their experiences in GPNC.
Results:
Using a standard content analysis, four constructs of social support (emotional, informational, instrumental, and appraisal) were identified through three major themes: (1) informational support, offered by peers in GPNC settings, promotes learning and prepares women for motherhood; (2) emotional and appraisal support, offered by peers in GPNC, improves emotional well-being and helps women build lasting, supportive connections with peers, and (3) emotional, informational, instrumental, and appraisal support work in tandem to create positive relationships between women and health care providers.
Conclusion:
Social support provided a means to a positive prenatal health care experience that facilitated the attainment of new knowledge and the formation of positive relationships with health care providers and peers. The findings of this study can provide health care providers with a framework to examine and enhance their practice and care of women in the perinatal period.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.