2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2016.10.072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Promoting hydrogen production and minimizing catalyst deactivation from the pyrolysis-catalytic steam reforming of biomass on nanosized NiZnAlOx catalysts

Abstract: Hydrogen production from the thermochemical conversion of biomass was carried out with nano-sized NiZnAlOx catalysts using a two-stage fixed bed reactor system. The gases derived from the pyrolysis of wood sawdust in the first stage were catalytically steam reformed in the second stage. The NiZnAlOx catalysts were synthesized by a co-precipitation method with different Ni molar fractions (5, 10, 15, 25 and 35%) and a constant Zn:Al molar ratio of 1:4. The catalysts were characterized by a wide range of techniq… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
(120 reference statements)
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This increase in hydrogen production and reduction of the catalyst deactivation rate were also observed in the case of the NiZnAlO x system used in the pyrolysis and subsequent steam reforming reactions [77]. The H 2 yield more than doubled, while the amount of introduced nickel on the catalyst surface rose from 5% to 35%.…”
Section: Catalysts For the Production Of A Hydrogen-rich Gas From Ligsupporting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This increase in hydrogen production and reduction of the catalyst deactivation rate were also observed in the case of the NiZnAlO x system used in the pyrolysis and subsequent steam reforming reactions [77]. The H 2 yield more than doubled, while the amount of introduced nickel on the catalyst surface rose from 5% to 35%.…”
Section: Catalysts For the Production Of A Hydrogen-rich Gas From Ligsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…The H 2 yield more than doubled, while the amount of introduced nickel on the catalyst surface rose from 5% to 35%. Dong et al [77] indicated that this was connected with the growth of the number of catalytically active sites (Ni • ) on the support. According to the obtained results, the presence of zinc oxide could protect a catalyst against an agglomeration of nickel particles and the formation of a coke deposit.…”
Section: Catalysts For the Production Of A Hydrogen-rich Gas From Ligmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the catalyst level, many attempts have been performed to control the deposition of coke in these reactions or minimize its impact. Changing the morphology of the metal (Ni) has recurrently been used to control catalyst deactivation, either by decreasing the particle size [254,255], changing the chemical environment of Ni [256], using a different synthetic pathway [257], using different calcination/reduction methods [144], or using other metals such as the incorporation of Co [258,259], the use of Fe-Zn [260] or other metals all together [261]. On the other side, several attempts have been made to control the catalyst deactivation trough support modification, either by changing porosity or metal placement on the support [28], or by using other conventional supports such as ZrO2, SiO2, MgO, TiO2 [262] or unconventional ones [263].…”
Section: Figure 15mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The impregnation method usually produces large metal particles, a weak interaction between metal particles and support, and a large inhomogeneity in the composition of catalysts [63,88,114]. Therefore, hydrotalcite-like compounds (HTlcs) [88,[119][120][121], palygorskite-like compounds [95], mayenite-like compounds [79] and other kinds of co-precipitated catalysts [110,122] attract increasing attention, since the preparation of uniform nanoparticles catalyst is important for the catalytic performance. Wang et al [85] reported that Ni-based catalysts prepared by co-precipitation had smaller metal nanoparticles, higher dispersion and stronger metal-support interaction than that prepared by wet impregnation, leading to a more stabilized solid structure and lower metal reduction extent.…”
Section: Influences Of Preparation and Pre-treated Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%